Only Two Senators Stood with the President for the NATO Summit

Only the two Senators Rand Paul and Mike Lee wanted to leave Donald Trump room to deal with the European nations to live up to their treaty obligations.

Other than those two Senators the Senate officially undermined President Trump’s negotiating position.

Only the two Senators Rand Paul and Mike Lee wanted to leave Donald Trump room to deal with the European nations to live up to their treaty obligations.

The Hill reports, “Senate votes to support NATO ahead of Trump summit.

Lawmakers […] overwhelmingly voted in favor of a motion supporting NATO, as President Trump continues to criticize the alliance […].

The nonbinding motion, which came as the Senate voted to reconcile its version of the annual defense policy bill with that of the House, expresses the Senate’s support for NATO and calls on negotiators to reaffirm the U.S. commitment to it.

The 97-2 vote in the Senate comes as Trump heads to Brussels. […]

GOP Sens. Rand Paul (Ky.) and Mike Lee (Utah) voted against the measure.

Read the full story.

The Senate was doing all it could, by that vote, to undermine President Donald Trump’s leverage to negotiate with the European NATO contries to live up to their treaty obligations. The only way that he can get them to change their way is to be able to convince them that he might be willing to walk away from the deal himself.

The Senate is telling deadbeat Europe, “Don’t worry. We’ve got your back. Donald Trump won’t be president forever.”

The Senate is the central refuge of Never Trump establishment GOP power. I fully expect many of them to endorse a Republican challenger in 2020.

Of course, while Mike Lee and Rand Paul were heroic, not all the Republican Senators interpreted the vote as a way to constrain President Trump.

Axios quotes a couple of them, showing a contrast:

–Republican Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch: “I think sometimes he can be a little too critical of the other counterparts, and I don’t think he should be critical,” per ABC.

–Republican Sen. Cory Gardner of Colorado defended Trump on Fox News, saying, “I think he’s simply trying to say to our great NATO allies and friends, ‘Let’s make sure that we’re all rowing in the same direction, so to speak. Let’s make sure that we’re living up to our expectations and obligations,'” per Think Progress.

Read the entire Axios report.

So Gardner claims to support what Trump is doing. I believe him but I don’t think he should have allowed his name to be part of the pro-NATO motion.

Hatch on the other hand wants President Trump to stop being “critical.” Then how is he supposed to get our “allies and friends” to contribue what they promished and not leave us holding the bag?

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Send this to a friend