Karl Rove Praises Attorney General Eric Holder!

Oh Boy. Karl Rove thinks that Attorney General Eric Holder did “something of a good job” when he went to Ferguson, Missouri to check things out for himself.

Interestingly, he points out exactly why the Attorney General failed in his visit to Ferguson. If all the AG had done was gone to Ferguson and connected with the people there to let them know that our government and our people understood their anger… that would have been fine. Instead he also made it sound like the cop was guilty – without actually doing an investigation.

Anyway, here’s Rove praising the Attorney General.

Trending: When a Pro-Life Story Ruined a Planned Parenthood Celebration

CHRIS WALLACE: Karl. Attorney General Holder visited Ferguson this week and very pointedly said, I understand — not that I condone or agree with, but I understand the mistrust you have in the police department, and he talked about some cases where he had been profiled. Afterwards he met, you can see here on the screen, with Captain Ron Johnson of the state highway patrol, who is in charge of the police effort, who said that he thought that Holder and the fact that the grand jury was beginning to hear actual evidence, were the two major factors in calming the situation in Ferguson. Do you think Holder did a good job?

KARL ROVE: I think he did something of a good job. We have two narratives here. One narrative emerging from the black community that the police killed a young black man who was approaching with his arms up, saying don’t shoot. We have a second narrative which is we have a young – a violent young black man who assaulted a police officer and the police officer felt threatened. We won’t know until the justice system works its way through which narrative is correct. I think Holder did a good thing by going to the community and saying, as a chief law enforcement officer in the country, I understand where you’re coming from because I have felt racial prejudice in my own life, even when I was a prosecutor. 

If I was going to be critical, though, I would say this. I was worried about some of the words that he used. He said we can’t have a conversation about what happened on August 9, and sometime in December nothing has happened. And the world is watching because there were issues raised by the shooting of Michael Brown predate this incident. He would have been better off had he said, I understand where you’re coming from because I’ve suffered this myself, and I’m going to make certain that justice is done and we’ll get to the bottom of this. Instead, it sounded like he was putting his thumb on the scale saying, this young black man did not deserve to die, and we’re going to get this cop.


The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Send this to a friend