Democrats to Legislate What People Say… Before Sex

I seem to remember a time in American politics when Democrats were constantly complaining about the Republicans serial (and deviant) desire to get into Americans bedrooms. Well, apparently some time over the last few years the Democrats have embraced this feeling and decided to get right up into every Americans bedroom.

Democrats across the country are now pushing for a national “Yes Means Yes” or Affirmative Consent Law. A national law of this magnitude would mean that every single sex act that takes place across the country would be legislated! If you thought Obamacare was intrusive… wait until you have Harry Reid standing over your bed as you prepare to engage in the horizontal polka. 

If you don’t like specifically discussing what is and is not permissible before you begin your night of love making… then prepare to face rape or sexual assault charges. This is about to get very messy…


Trending: The Jesus was a Socialist Lie

New York Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, one of the most prominent lawmakers fighting campus sexual assault on Capitol Hill, said Monday that controversial affirmative consent laws should be made the standard nationwide.

Gillibrand was speaking as part of an MSNBC-hosted panel event on sexual assault at the Fashion Institute of Technology in New York, which is a part of the State University of New York (SUNY) system. During the panel, she praised SUNY’s recent adoption of affirmative consent at the urging of Governor Andrew Cuomo, and was asked whether she thought the standard could potentially be implemented at the national level.

consent“I definitely have been studying it and looking at it,” she said, according to an account by Capital New York. “I think there’s something there, and I think that is where our debate needs to go.”

Affirmative consent, often known as “only yes means yes,” is a standard which holds that an individual commits sexual assault if they do not receive explicit prior consent for each sexual act they commit with a person. This standard is an alternative to the “no means no” standard that prevails in criminal law, where a rape or sexual assault only occurs if a person explicitly refuses their consent, or is incapacitated and unable to either grant or refuse consent.

The standard is currently required by law at all California colleges receiving state money, and is voluntarily used at several others. Gillibrand didn’t elaborate on how she would attempt to make the policy a national one, but the federal government could likely force the standard on almost all other schools by adding it to the contents of Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex discrimination at all schools receiving federal funds.

Affirmative consent has been sharply criticized by civil liberties advocates such as the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), who say the standard creates a presumption of guilt and does not correspond to what the sexual relationships of young people actually look like.

Supporters, however, argue that the law is needed in order to aid and empower victims who currently struggle to obtain justice if they are raped in the context of a dating relationship or after consuming alcohol.

Gillibrand also used the panel event as an opportunity to try regaining control of the sexual assault narrative. Recently, activists have been hindered by the revelation that Rolling Stone’s bombshell story about a gang rape at the University of Virginia was potentially fabricated, as well as by a Department of Justice report indicating that campus sexual assault rates are far lower than activists claim.

“Regardless of the measure you use…too many rapes are happening on our college campuses today, and not enough justice is being delivered,” said Gillibrand, according to the New York Observer.

Sexual assault has been one of Gillibrand’s top issues during her time in the Senate. In particular, in the past two years she spearheaded the effort to address sexual assault in the military by attempting to remove sexual assault investigations from the military chain of command.


The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Send this to a friend