Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Culture Homosexuality Politics

Conservative Destroys Democrat “Anti-Christian Bigot”

Conservative columnist Dana Loesch is much admired on the right for her wit and intellect, as well as her willingness to spar with liberals.

She recently weighed in on the Benham Brothers controversy and wondered aloud why Democrats were so happy in their roles as anti-Christian bigots.

Watch the fireworks here.

(Below is an edited transcript – hitting the higlights)

JESSICA ERLICH:  What I find sad and disturbing is that really what you have here are two attention-seeking reality television wannabe appearing brothers who are political activists who have an extreme agenda, and are trying to cloak it in this, sort of, you know, religious freedom characterization, and using that as a way to get, you know, their own business and drive that. And I find that very disturbing.

FOX NEWS’ MARTHA MACCALLUM:  Saying that they had their political beliefs, they had their religious beliefs, and, you know, people can read them and take a look at them. They might find them offensive or they may not. But at what point do you sort of cross the line where you say, ‘What I think in private should not really be part of the business transactions that I’m part of?’ Dana?

DANA LOESCH:  Well, I have to jump into Jessica’s remark, I wonder if she finds it disturbing and attention-seeking that the brothers were actually committed still to the six families whose homes they were flipping for this television show. They had already started production and when HGTV pulled it, the brothers continued on their time and on their own dime, I might add, to continue their promise and fulfill what they said they were going to do with these families. So, if we’re going to have a conversation…

hate speechERLICH:  That has nothing to do with their political beliefs.

LOESCH:  Well, you just said that you found it disturbing. I just don’t understand the anti-Christian bigotry. I mean the world is big enough for all of us, don’t you think?

ERLICH:  It’s, it is absolute, that’s what, what you just said encapsulates my argument completely.

LOESCH:  How so?

ERLICH:  There is no anti-Christian bigotry here. They have cloaked their political views, which are radical…[crosstalk] these are not Christian views.

ERLICH:  They are anti-abortion and anti-homosexuality and those are their positions. Those are not the positions of most Christians, and for you to say that is outrageous. (Author’s Note – “Um. What? Most Christians are pro-life and against gay marriage… what is she talking about?)

LOESCH: How does that not make you anti-Christian, using your logic, Jessica? How is it that they are anti-homosexual, but you’re not anti-Christian?

LOESCH:  If we’re going to have a theological discussion, let’s start with your name calling, your smearing of these brothers just because you’re an anti-Christian bigot!

Loesch is completely correct here – and maybe this is the tact we need to take with liberals from here on out. If we are bigots for our opposition to gay marriage or any other hosts of issues, then they too must be bigots for their opposition to our beliefs! I would further propose that from now on we refer to liberals as anti-Christian BIGOTS, whenever we discuss their positions on political issues.

Liberals hate us because of what we believe. It’s time we call them out for their hateful bigotry.

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

About the author

Onan Coca

Onan is the Editor-in-Chief at Romulus Marketing. He's also the managing editor at, and the managing partner at You can read more of his writing at Eagle Rising.
Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in Atlanta with his wife and their three wonderful children.

  • AZWarrior

    God- She sounds like the spawn of Gollum and Satan.

  • 1americanjane

    See: typical left wing bigot. Talks over the top of everybody. will not let you get a word in edgewise. What fools we on the right are to let these parrots bully us into silence. In our respect for religious freedom, we have let these anti-Christin bigots drive the conversation. Actually, as Christians, we are responsible for “getting the word out” And God will have the last word for all of us.

    • You need to understand that they do this for control, it is all about the few controlling the many. The obozo regime and his following want a dictatorship and the only way that they will have it is to strip us down to nothing.

      • 1americanjane

        [email protected], That is my point. Thank you for further defining it in case someone else missed it.

  • HappyClinger

    Because religion is a set of beliefs that affect and even determine your worldview, it is impossible to separate that from your life. Duh. We need to get religion BACK INTO politics AND business if we ever have any hope of buoying the sinking ship that is America.

    • Blessings


    • TroyCrowe

      I hate to say it but I think we are doomed. We have too many so called Christians on the other side and there are too many couch potatoes in our land. I say this probably every day, only 30% of our population on average votes during the Presidential elections. The state level voting percentages are way less, somewhere between 5% and 10%. Without many more people involved I am not sure we can turn it around without a fight. You see, numbers speak force. In a land of over 300,000,000 people that only has about 90,000,000 voting for the President you have to understand that roughly 60% of that are professed conservative. Only about 3% of that are physically active out in public standing against what is happening. If we has 100,000,000 people in there face they would be too scared to not change their ways. I think they would poo there pants if that many people ascended on Washington DC. I am aware that my figures are not completely accurate but they are not too far off. If they were a couple million of they still prove my point.

      • Clay Fitzgerald

        A question arises from your assertion… how many people, out of 300+ million, are actually eligible to vote in this nation? Estimates of those eligible to vote is about 2/3rds of the population (excluded are children under 18, non-citizens and convicted felons), there are 146.3 million registered voters and there were 131.3 million ballots cast for president in 2012. In light of those numbers, verifiable, the rest of what you assert is only what you surmise. Your citation that “…roughly 60% of that are professed conservative” is based on what… exactly? Most statistics cited show most people’s voting history is independent, voting for the person they feel best represents their views, and a relatively small number of voters are hard core liberal democrats of conservative republicans, voting strictly on party line and philosophy.
        I tend to vote conservatively, but have crossed party lines to vote for the person who will best represent my views for positions at the county and municipal levels.

        • TroyCrowe

          Like I stated, I know my numbers are off but I think that the numbers that are verifiable, as you say, are skewed as well. The reason being, is for example, the 100% ballot situation in some districts in favor of Obummer in places around the country last election. Things such as that. I also know that a large number of votes stayed home last election cycle because of Romney being the selection. I personally know a few of them and they are die hard conservatives. I don’t completely disagree with your assessment. I however would question where or not most people vote independent. How in the heck would the bum in the white house be elected a second time if not for party line voting? If what you say is true about the number of individuals being small in hard core ideological sides then the to me stands in agreement of what I said about the low number of voters. We do not have enough bum people in our country who would in their right mind vote for this administration. The voting rolls were down this last Presidential contest. The GOP is still harping about that.

          • Clay Fitzgerald

            Sorry that you disagree, but it what you post reads like mumbo-jumbo that you seem to just conjure from the top of your head. I understand opinion, but you back it up with nonsense.

    • Seldena

      Absolutely! llChronicles 7:14 is the answer!! This is what will save America.

  • Blessings

    Jessica’s of the world will reap their rewards after they take their last breath…While we live amongst them, just consider their moral fiber as damaged goods, and when we hear things like this and aren’t their to voice our opinion, just say “thank you father for your love and the knowledge of truth”… Christ told us we will be hated because we love him…I’ll take that any day over the alternative.

    • TroyCrowe

      The Lord stated. If you try to share the word with people who reject you, “Dust off your feat and walk away”. Too many Christians put a bad taste in peoples mouths, who just might not be ready or you are the wrong messenger, just by not following that simple precept.

  • Irredeemable Gary

    I’d say let’s do the same thing we did when Duck Dynasty was harassed… But who watches Home and Garden besides gays, stay-at-home moms, and stay-at-home retirees who are too lazy to get off their arses and be active in the twilight years of their lives (for the sake of Brenda Deel)?

    Their show oughta be picked up by one of the networks

    • Brenda Deel

      Gary…I take exception to your question “But who watches Home and Garden besides gays and stay-at-home moms?” I am a devout believer in Jesus Christ and am very active in my church. Some of my favorite shows are on HGTV. After working in the business world for nearly 50 years, I am now a stay-at-home retiree…neither gay nor a mother of young children. One of the reasons for what’s happening in our country today is that too many people speak out without first thinking about what they’re going to say!!

      • Irredeemable Gary

        Edited my comment to accommodate your hurt feelings…

      • TroyCrowe

        You got that right.

      • Seldena

        Very good Brenda!

    • TroyCrowe

      I used to. I really enjoy the art of fixing up homes and there can be a lot of money to be gained from it. I looked at it as instructional.

    • 1americanjane

      you jerkish moron. How do you know Brenda Deel is lazy or sits on her…? I am also a retired watcher of HGTV. usually on my dvr because I am “too lazy to get off their arses and be active in the twilight years of their lives” (for the sake of Brenda Deel)? how the he double hockystick do you know? Maybe Brenda Deel is as busy as I am trying to undo the damage done by the likes of you.

      • Irredeemable Gary

        Ya’ll are typical liberals who wear their feelings on their sleeves. If you got time to watch TV/dvr, then I’d say yer as lazy as Brenda Deel. (Sucks being run over by the bus several times, eh Brenda?)

        I made a comment, and you shiite heads decided to call me “jerkish moron. Suck it up, Americanjane. There isn’t enough time left to worry about who put yer panties in a wad.

        • 1americanjane

          sorry, Gary. you are not a moron. You are a joke. And you are the first ever to call me a liberal. That’s the biggest insult of all.

          • Irredeemable Gary

            AWESOME! Always good to be the first, 😀

            Here’s an idea, Stop defending those who get their feelings hurt over a criticism of a silly TV show.

            It is SO liberal to latch on to a non-sequitur and divide over it. Alinsky would be proud!

          • 1americanjane

            I think you are just looking for someone to hurt. I will willingly be your whipping post, since you seem to need an outlet for your venom. Confuses me a little about the show. I haven’t seen it. May God bless and keep you, make His face shine upon you and give you His peace.

          • Irredeemable Gary

            Don’t try and play the victim now, A-Jane. That is also a liberal technique.

            Let me remind you of your first words to me:

            “you jerkish moron. How do you know Brenda Deel is lazy or sits on her…? I”

            Some of us have been in this game for years, and are ‘so over’ people who drive-by web sites and fire off comments, then retreat behind their monitors in anonymity. When called on it, they claim abuse.

            Dennis Prager coined a phrase: It’s better to seek understanding than agreement.

            Let’s agree on that.

          • 1americanjane

            Understanding is what I offered you. You are more a victim than I. I did not say abuse. I offered you an outlet for your anger. Live long and prosper.

        • 1americanjane

          so sorry. I thought you are a liberal.

    • Brian

      Go easy on the retirees Gary. I’m 81 and still work I also don’t watch TV (can’t afford it) My thoughts are, whatever happened to “I disagree with what you said, but will defend o the death your right to say it”

      • Irredeemable Gary

        Brian, I too am retired. Not by choice, but because of cancer. I refuse to sit and be quiet, living the life I have left to the fullest, and wouldn’t have said anything regarding retirees until Brenda Deel sounded off with her admonishment.

        IF they can’t stand the heat, then stay out of the furnace.

  • BoSplosion

    The left wants to destroy your right to have Biblically based beliefs. They’re fine with big government worshipping, socially liberal Christianity, but those whose beliefs do not conform will be smeared, attacked, and marginalized as enemies of the utopian state.

  • Dawn Garland

    you go girl! tell her like it is!

  • JimBob

    Jessica is an anti Christian bigot. Hey Jessica, do you think Islam will make a better America for us?

    • Omer the 3rd

      Libs are unable to think that far…

  • Anthony Alexander

    Nobody destroyed anyone…both were talking at the same time making it difficult to understand the entire matter….What a Joke…No one destroyed anything but their own integrity by behaving like two sparrows fighting over a scrap of bred on the sidewalk…Lets be OBJECTIVE here!

    • Irredeemable Gary

      Objectively speaking, what is ‘bred’?

      • Anthony Alexander

        Sorry BREAD…Ever see two sparrows or a group of em fighting over food on the sidewalk…you can’t hear anything but them

        • Irredeemable Gary

          Kinda like a couple of moms with strollers at Starbucks in Beverly Hills gossiping about the latest smut on the tube *-*

          • Anthony Alexander

            Exactly, another good analogy……

    • Seldena

      Come on Anthony! The liberal was put in her place of intolerating another view. It was great to see a liberal called out!

      • Anthony Alexander

        I didn’t see it….Look I am a conservative and I hate these liberals and yes the liberal on the left had that smug look and had every excuse to throw out there but I see that day in and day out with these A_SSHOLES…….but the discussion was way out of hand and made both look bad.

  • John

    Evil lurks among us and it’s called a Democrat!

    • Bellagio551

      big·ot·ry: stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one’s own.

      WoW! The very definition of a Libtard.

  • OldVeteran

    Shouldn’t people have the right to use their religious beliefs when in the act of electing officials into office? Can’t believers pick those who will perform their duties with a Christian mind set? Would these anti- Christian voters elect some who want to use sharia law while performing their duties of office. Could the voters trust an atheist to act with justice in which there would be some limit to allowing or limiting freedoms. The bible is used to administer the oath of office. Do we do away with that practice? Then what could be used to make the oath have some power to ensure these elected will do the right things that will benefit the people and the country? Having a belief in a supreme being should not be a detriment to making America a country that people of ALL faiths want to come live here.

    • threebs3

      YES! You are entitled to your opinions and views. Our country was based, in part, on this anything else is totalitarianism, or communism. We are a Republic where your first amendment rights are what they are, not what the left thinks they are, which is think as I do or die.

    • TroyCrowe

      You are completely correct. They do not see it that way however. They believe that if stand for Biblical values then you are against them. The error on the part of Christian who fall into this type of thinking is that they cannot separate the distinction between hating the sin and hating people. This is the same ploy liberal strive off of. They suggest that if you do not like what I do you must hate me. Christians are called to love people and the only why you can truly love someone is by truth. The truth sets people free. Love is not an emotion it is the act of speaking truth that you may help someone from stumbling and destroying themselves through sin. The result of sin is death and separation from God. Saving someone from that is true love.

      • Seldena

        Yes, as Christians we are to love our enemies and we are to love everyone. We love the sinner and hate the sin.

  • bfit58

    there is the rub:…if you have a biblical worldview, you are now a political ‘extremist’.
    that is what was said and what Dana Loesch took an objection too.
    Very clear, and inarguable….

  • crazysmartguy

    You are free to believe and say (almost) anything you want. However if those beliefs become public or already were public, the company you work for has a right to say you do not represent our company values and can fire you. Freedom of Speech and Religion applies ONLY to the government not private citizens and companies. In fact this is an example of freedom of speech, but it HGTV that is getting to express their freedom and Christians don’t like that other people have a right to reject their beliefs as they see fit. It is the government that cannot prohibit free speech and freedom of religion and I don’t see the FBI knocking on the Benham brother’s door.

    • Omer the 3rd

      Just because they have the ‘right’ to fire someone, doesn’t make them RIGHT to do it.

    • Seldena

      Why should the FBI knock on their doors? The problem was that If these men were gay there would have been no outcry to have them cancelled. You understand the injustice here, right? I am so proud of the customers of SUN Trust bank that fought back this injustice. You must be a liberal only wanting your view accepted. Not going to happen. Our views are just as important as yours! It is called FREEDOM!

    • Live Free or Die

      Nice point. Except those folks that owned their own bakery or photography business were not allowed to say” I’d rather not bake a cake with two men on top” or “I’d rather not take your pictures.” Seems that your theory only works in one direction,crazy smart guy.

      • Proud Conservative Mom

        AMEN! My heart broke when I read about the Elaine Photography case some time ago, which you obviously refer to. I am hopping mad at how often our G-d given rights and beliefs are violated by the Commie Left and their Commie activist judges.

        • Live Free or Die

          Amen, Sister. God bless you. God help America, please.

    • TroyCrowe

      “Freedom of Speech and Religion applies ONLY to the government not private citizens and companies”. This would say that private citizens do not have freedom of speech and Religion. Really? What country do you live in? That is totally not true. You may want to get some remedial education on the freedoms we have as Americans. Also, freedom of speech and religion does apply between an employer and an employee. An employer does not have the right, according to the constitution, to treat a person any way they want just because they have different views. They can fire them alright. But if it can be proven that it was because of their views then their is a lawsuit waiting to happen. Equal Opportunity laws specifically state that actions of discrimination are not tolerable and religious beliefs are one of the things that are protected. They come up with some other reason to avoid the lawsuit usually. The reality is that the laws are not currently upheld for those actions. I would not be surprised if the LBJ (not sure if that is correct but it is a Law Firm who fights conservative discrimination cases all the time) was planning a Law Suite right now. The court systems have been so turned up side down by the Liberals that injustice in rampant.

    • Judy

      But when sodomites want pictures taken or a cake baked Christians are forced to do this even though it doesn’t represent their views. How is that fair.

      • TroyCrowe

        Its not, but not enough people are standing up against it. 100,000,000 people would do the trick. How many are involved? Maybe a few million. That is nothing to be concerned about in retrospect to the number of citizens. They look at it and think, well the majority of Americans do not have a problem with it. They are correct in what they say unfortunately. The other 200,000,000 plus Americans have spoken by not speaking.

        • Korean War Vet

          Guilty by omission.

  • Snailmailtrucker

    When people can not even accept themselves
    (homosexuals who refuse to accept that they were born males and Nature dictates that they mate with Females of their species)
    (to further that Species)

    Why should anyone else accept them?

  • Frank629


  • Proud Conservative Mom

    AMEN and AMEN. I especially love the last line “Liberals hate us because of what we believe. It’s time we call them out for their hateful bigotry.” I have been saying this for a very very long time. It is past due that we fight fire with fire.

  • TroyCrowe

    I have issue with the anti-Christian bigot suggesting the Christians are not against Abortion or Homosexuality. First of all, if a person who calls themselves a Christian is for either then they do not stand for what they espouse to believe in. The Bible and 10 Commandments are clearly against both. People of faith and non-faith confuse God’s actions in the Bible with what he prescribes us to live by. He is the judge and if he decides to destroy a nation for their perversion then he has can, after all who is going to stop him. I cannot stand people who call themselves Christians and live totally by different believe systems as to what the word teaches. That being said, we all have feet made of clay and are not perfect but one who stands on the opposite side of the theology, that they profess, is only releasing hot air when confessing to be Christian. These people who constantly bash Christians, and some of them actually suggest that they are Christians, definitely are bigots and need to be treated identified as such. They are truly the bigots anyway. We Christians just live by our convictions that are instructed via the one true God, Jesus Christ.

  • FRENCHIE1369


  • rfkcalif

    I find it amazing that the left, anti Christian when they run into trouble they are the first to pray for help. My father was an admitted anti-Christian bigot. As an example, when he had a heart attack, he started going to church. It didn’t last long, but he made an effort. Another good example; after the 9/11 the left leaning anti-Christians stood on the WH steps and all said a prayer. How’s that for bigotry?

    • Irredeemable Gary

      Heck. The Sunday after 9/11, church attendance was through the roof!

      it was short lived though, as time separated the the event, people once again became complacent.

    • Omer the 3rd

      The Holy Spirit within all of us is stronger than the evil filth of this world. If only they could listen, and hear that small, still voice every day, instead of the indoctrination pouring forth from the TV, computer and media.

      • TroyCrowe

        Not everyone contains the Holy Spirit. You have to receive him first and to many Christians that is a rejected foreign being. Many of them believe it is a voodoo of some sort conjured up by the Pentecostal church. Many Christians, unfortunately, pick and choose what they want to believe from the Bible as well. We need to clean up our home before we can clean up a nation. The bible actually speaks of sweeping our own house first.

    • wmgill

      On their death bed, atheist’s pray that they were wrong.

      • Judy

        Like my brother always told me. There is no athiest in a foxhole.

      • Proud Conservative Mom

        The Bible puts it beautifully. Only a fool says in his heart that there is no G-d!

  • DC/Tex

    The homosexual (not PC gay) “AGENDA” is the worst disease infecting and destroying the morals and family values of the USA, the world, and children (their main target).
    Homosexuals WERE NOT BORN THAT WAY, they CHOOSE their UNNATURAL UNHEALTHY lifestyle, so, homosexuality does not qualify as a civil rights discrimination issue.
    Homosexuals had equal rights, now they have special rights and want more. Every special right awarded to homosexuals infringes on our rights.
    Homosexuality will NEVER be natural, healthy (mentally or physically), normal, accepted, or OK!
    God loves everyone, as we all should, including homosexuals. God hates all sin, as we all should, including homosexuality and he says it is an abomination.

    • DetroitDom

      DC/Tex – As a Christian and lover of Freedom, I do not like nor agree with the LGBT agenda. It is being forced upon America using a PC beatdown stick against anyone who stands against it. It is RIDICULOUS!!

      However, as a Christian, I will also not judge those who are homosexual. I will leave the judgement to God, for only He knows their hearts. Not being a homosexual, I cannot state factually whether homosexuality is a choice or genetic.

      • TroyCrowe

        There is no Gay Gene. They have been searching for it for years and have concluded that it does not exist. And even if a scientist came out and stated that there was one, why would anyone believe their lying mouths anyway. They have feet of clay as well and can be persuaded just like any other. Look at the Global Warming cabal.

      • DC/Tex

        Homosexuals are like alcoholics and drug abuse, they try it for some reason and cannot quit until they realize that they must have help and turn to God. All destructive lifestyles are chosen.

      • Judy

        It is not genetic anymore than any other sinful lifestyle is genetic. It’s a choice.

    • janis mcdonald

      We live in a country with an over 50% divorce rate. Single motherhood and deadbeat dads are becoming the norm rather than the exception. Pornography is still the number one U.S. business on the internet. The long-time, hypocrticial cover-up by the Catholic church of it’s child predators is a sin that should still sicken us all — something we should never forget
      To call the “gay agenda the worst disease infecting and destroying morals and family values” — sorry, I disagree..

      • DC/Tex

        All that you mention are very bad and unacceptable, but, I have never heard of a parade to celebrate or a pride day for divorces, deadbeat dads……. The homosexual “Agenda” is the worst of the worst!

    • drrowe1776

      The bigots are the ones calling the Christians the bigots! Unreal!
      Like the liberals abortion argument about it being the woman’s body. Any person with a brain can clearly understand that it is someone else’s skull that gets crushed, someone else’s brain that gets sucked out and someone else’s body that gets ripped apart and sucked out, NOT the woman’s. So sick of liberals and their evil twisted minds.

  • Gen. Black Jack Pershing

    Politics and Religion are same thing, and they should have religious freedom. The founding call them twins.

  • Seldena

    WOW! I enjoyed this exchange! The brothers did not bring their Christain, biblical views into this until they were pointed out by a liberal. They believe in God establishing marriage btwn a man and woman They also said they love the gays but disagree with them. What is the problem here?The libs cannot stand it if you do not see “things their way” syndrome. They want you to tolerate their view, but they do not give you the respect if yours is different. This is why the liberals are so dividing in this country. I disagree with the gay lifestyle, but I do not hate them . I get along with other views. We have the freedom to agree to disagree.

    • Korean War Vet

      Your last sentence is the key to this entire STOOPID argument, Seldena: “We have the freedom to agree to disagree”; thank you!

      • pthor


        • Korean War Vet

          I am aware of my spelling abilities, pthor, and I purposely capitalized the mispelled word ‘STOOPID’ to to grab the readers’ attention. Thanks for the lesson, anyhoo. 😎

          • pthor

            Glad I could help.

  • ECwashr

    Typical liberal fool, attacks Christians with total venom and hate and then calls others who point this out disgraceful. This liberal fool women is a hypocrite, she makes me sick!!

    • Proud Conservative Mom

      Touche! I echo the sentiment.

  • Charlie

    “Let’s not get rude about this” being stated over the top of the voice of another is in itself very rude. In a debate one person should be able to state their point of view uninterrupted and give opponent the same respect . In above video the Jessica was willing to interrupt , talk louder to have her point of view be the only point of view . Then Jessica stated to Dana that she did not need to be “rude” when Dana called Jessica out on her my way or the highway point of view.

    • You may be on to something here…
      Liberals = shout loudly and carry a small stick.
      Conservatives = speak softly and carry a large stick.

      • Charlie

        Conservatives need to acquire the positions of power to be able to swing the big stick . Other wise the big stick is just a walking stick used to support old ideology and this would truly be a shame .

      • Johnstoirvin

        And then there’s Harry Reid = talk softly and be a big prik.

    • Proud Conservative Mom

      Jessica performed like a typical Commie Lib does. My way or the highway.
      The Left never cared about whose rights they trampled on. We all have to join hands to follow them over the rainbow (and over a cliff) to their blissful land of Utopia (which is Statist Hell on Earth) where we can all pick rice in the paddies together and be equally poor.

      • Ted Crawford

        Exactly right! This ….idiocy (Progressivism, currently) in spite of a wealth of historical evidence and sound wisdom, pointing out the reality of such ideology!
        ” The inherent vice of Capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings, the inherent virtue of Socialism is the Equal sharing of Miseries” Winston Churchill
        “The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money” Margaret Tharcher
        “Most people seek what they do not possess and are enslaved by the very things they want to aquire!” Anwar Sadat

      • Charlie

        Agree with you 🙂 !
        This type of behavior of talking over another is quite often seen used by people in the wrong to try to put credence to their misconceptions of reality .

  • DENavarro

    This is exactly the tact we need to take with liberal hypocrites — we have let them define the terms of the competition for too long, it is time we start calling them the bigots and racists that they truly are.

  • jd1958

    Boy howdy! Liberals are in for one “hell” of a surprise come judgment day!

    • Ted Crawford

      The Progressives are surprized nearly everyday. Being delusional and clueless, every major event surprizes them. Even their President, is unaware of what actually occurs, outside the Progressive Utopia within his head, untill he hears about it from Rachel Maddow, or Chris Matthews!

  • seeymour kleerly

    Could this just be anti RELIGION?

    • Judah

      seeymour, no it isnt anti religeon. if you watch themaistream media they
      show great tolernce for muslims…they even outright ignore the beheadings
      and crucifictions happening around the world. There is nothing COEXIST
      about these people. Jesus said this would happen s let not you hearts be
      toubled. He will soon return to take those that are His.

      • Ray_Downen

        Seeing the antics of Muslims is apt to make one forget that Islam includes a religion of hatred and destruction. So when we speak of religion, we forget that includes Islam.

  • janis mcdonald

    When did we as a society start turning to “celebrities” for their intellectual input on religion, politics or whatever? These brothers design houses, right? I googled them a little bit, was kind of turned off by their stand on “teaching evolution being satan’s toehold in the classroom” — but I wouldn’t watch them (or NOT watch them) because of their stand on evolution — I would watch them for their home design input.

    • $104618240

      Agreed. If I want to discuss other topics, I’ll seek out other sources for the respective topic of discussion. Most celebrities, in my humble view, are vapid, vacuous, narcissistic rubes who haven’t a clue.

      • Ted Crawford

        The empirical proof for your assertion is the fact that they, overwhelmingly, vote Progressive!

  • Up Huff

    Me, I just call them what they are: bigoted aholes. Their characterization of people who actually believe what the Bible says about homosexuality makes them true believers, and those who say otherwise are those whom Christ will spit out.

  • TAM44

    Liberalism is a disease it kills the brain leaving one so dead from the neck up they go through life lost.

    • The duck

      Are you refering to our past house speaker and he like of her in congress? My such bigotry. She got us Obama Care by forcing it downour throats.

      • TAM44

        The DNC through God under a bus during their convention and they take pride in circling obama to protect him and his constant string of lies. nancy pelosi is one of those brain dead liberals, as is the democrat party. Oh, their are plenty of rino’s who are just closet democrats too.

  • sanman99


    25% of the Democrats in
    this country are on medication for mental illness.

    That’s scary. It means
    75% are running around untreated.

    • magic1114

      I hope you’re kidding, although I have a feeling you aren’t. Scary!

    • pthor

      You’re being a little harsh dude! The fact is that 99% 0f liberals give the other 1% bad name…

      • The duck

        How true how true.

    • Irredeemable Gary

      Now that’s some funny shiite!

      • sanman99

        It would be funnier if it were not so true.

  • Greg B

    Leftist definition of a bigot–anyone who disagrees with me publicly.

  • FloridaJim

    “No anti-Christian views” are the words of a fool as we all know while viewing so many daily. When you hear the anti-Christian comment ask yourself if this were anti-muslim would it be said?

    • Red Blues

      That implicit acceptance of Islam and its hatred for all things western is what has gotten us into the mess we are in.

      There is a recent YT vid that speaks about the horrors currently being endured in Sweden. The Swede’s in government are rolling over and not doing anything about the mass immigration of radical Islamist nationals who are then terrorizing and literally raping their own citizens.

      Sad to say that is what is headed our way and will soon erupt like a bad virus on this nation if we don’t speak up soon!

  • Red Blues

    “…propose that from now on we refer to liberals as anti-Christian BIGOTS, whenever we discuss their positions…”

    Well, now this is the most sound doctrine I’ve read in a some time. The attitude held by many progressives and leftists is that what they think and believe should take precedence over others simply because it is *their* view or belief.

    How is that any different from the attitudes held by so many other – professed – bigots? It is not!. I think that the time is long overdue to start calling them out on their hypocrisy!

  • LC

    God Bless Dana Loesch! Christian targeting by the left has hit an extreme. Why are our views “bigoted” and theirs are not? Hypocrisy reigns high with the leftist agenda whose purpose is to eliminate God and family.

  • Brian

    I watched this on Fox. The Libby was unbelievable. I LOVE Dana. Btw the last time I checked most of the signers of the Declaration of independence were Christians. Most had Theology related degrees. Oh btw they’re all HETEROSEXUAL.

  • madman

    Erlich is nothing more than a bigot.

  • Ddenney1

    I guess the homosexual agenda is NOT political ?? NOT A SMIGEND ???

  • slk5

    what a beautiful woman!!! and physically, dana is a looker too!!! what puzzles me most, is how liberals/socialists/communists, with all of the spinning, can still walk!!!

  • Melanie Burns

    I like it! Anti-Christian Bigots, White-hating Racists, anti-family murderers.

  • Knife10

    I guess I missed the subtle destruction of the liberal in this almost unintelligible conversation. What seems to be a more accurate assessment is that both people had what they could get in edge wise of their say and went away frustrated with the debate. It should be a foregone conclusion that no reasonable conversation about any topic can be done with liberals since truth doesn’t matter and facts mean nothing to them. Since it is also obvious that we cannot coexist without friction and compromise is not an option, we are left with no choice but to confront our adversaries.

    • axmickl

      Unfortunately, the anti-christian bigot shouted over Dana every time she was in the process of making a good point. liberal anti-christian bigots are well schooled at camouflaging the truth, logic and decency. Make sure your opponent doesn’t get a chance to be heard. Remember Biden smirking all over America during his debate. Nobody remembers what his opponent was saying because they were amazed at the fools act.

      • Knife10

        You would think the talk shows on FOX and other networks would turn the microphones of other panelists off and keep the camera off them while someone is answering a question or making a statement…but noooo…the mikes stay on and the conversation becomes unintelligible. The end result is a pointless waste of air time. And it is doubly frustrating when a host asks a question then repeatedly talks over the guest who is trying to speak. One thing that should be abundantly clear by now is it’s pointless to invite a liberal on a talk show. When they aren’t outright lying, they’re mocking and obfuscating. Talking with them is an exercise in futility. It’s time to just slap them silly and move on.

  • Get Real

    What is to be done to stem the tide of the liberal epidemic of poisoning this once great and powerful and successful country?? The mad cabal of radical leftists must have believed that America was substantially weakened enough to insert the likes of Obama to be the preening and pompous front man while the dastardly liberal cadre step up the sabotage of what remains. There is a huge price to pay for being greedy and stupid.

    • $100468061

      The first thing to be done is to clean the Marxists out of the education system. To do so successfully, will require nothing less than a miracle from God. The war is being fought in the minds of the children. We are not winning. We are not even on the battlefield. The Marxists have run the universities for 60 years now. Common Core is their entryway into the public schools, providing them the tools they need to begin standardized brainwashing of children with a centrally controlled curriculum.

      In 30 years, your own children will be your enemies. They will hate America. They will be brainwashed into Marxist radicals by the 6th grade. You will lose control of them. America cannot survive this onslaught. Guns cannot save us on this battlefield.

      No candidate for conservative office should even be LOOKED at unless he or she addressed the education crisis and proposes a radical solution for it. All conservatives need to pull their children out of public schools, no matter the sacrifice entailed.

  • Jarhead

    Erlich is another maggot/bigot/idiot just like Reid, Pelosi, Boxer, Schumer, McCain, Holder, Bath House Barry, etc. and they all need to be drug tested, fired/impeached and then placed in a asylum for retards.

  • froggy

    “Christianity Bigot “I love it ,Thats calling a spade a spade.The libs are so blind that they display their bigotry toward all that is decent with impunity but will call decadence ,immorality etc . the new good, then the Snake is loose and must be beheaded .

  • Joe

    Dana Loesch is a hero. Speaks well and with grace.

  • tins6

    Liberals hate christians because they first hate Jesus, just like
    He predicted and it’s impossible for Jesus to lie. [end of story].

    • $100468061

      Liberals hate the Bible because they are brainwashed by Left Wing culturally Marxist influence. They are useful idiots. They have no idea that they are among the first targets of the Marxists once their usefulness is at an end. But most liberals are NOT Left Wingers or Marxists by conscious choice. They are generally one cause, one issue voters who are brainwashed by the Democrats.

      You may not realize it, but radical Marxists HATE liberals. But they use them to advance their cause by hiding behind liberal causes like a smokescreen.

  • axmickl

    Unfortunately, the anti-christian bigot shouted over Dana every time she was in the process of making a good point. liberal anti-christian bigots are well schooled at that. Make sure your opponent doesn’t get a chance to be heard. Remember Biden smirking all over America during his debate. Nobody remembers what his opponent was saying because they were amazed at the fools act.

  • $100468061

    You can’t reason with Marxists. Because they are ALWAYS disingenuous and never tell the truth. The best you can do is expose them in their lies and inconsistencies.

  • foxxybey

    Amen, that chick was a anti Christian bigot period a and got her tail beat down and glad. Homsexuality is not a political thing, it is a matter of what God thinks and He says it is a abombination and that is that.

  • Leo2Leo

    What happened to “tolerance” ?

    • Phyllis Booth-Finnegan

      Oh…you missed the memo. It’s no longer PC to be tolerant. The new tolerant is to be intolerant of tolerance when the tolerance isn’t PC! (Yes that is sarcasm, but true, because that’s how stupid it is!)

    • James Crooke

      Well be tolerant when the liberals/democrats are tolerant and not calling for all of us to either be killed or to get out of America. Last I saw we are suppose to be a free country with free speech and freedom of thought.

  • Jeff Haynes

    Yes, ALL Christians believe that abortion and homosexuality is wrong. Some people that claim to be Christians deny these Biblical truths. The Bible tells us what a true regenerate Christian is.

    • timmyT

      Go read Romans Chapter 1 and then tell me homosexuality is not a sin.

  • red55bird

    In the Name Of God, I’m sick of these people attacking anyone who comes out to say they believe in Gods laws, these two brothers have more goodness in there little pinkie then this women has for a brain.

    • NoCrud

      This woman has a brain, you say? If so, it’s like the brain of a whooping crane. ☺☻

  • boris

    I am glad for conservatives like Dana. I wouldn’t have 1 minute of patience with such dumbed down left wingers that hate God and all that stands for natural rights.

  • Worried

    dems are just like the nazis, they will follow the lead of their perverted leader and refuse to think for themselves. because we all know that dems are not allowed to think.

    • Henry L

      It’s not that they refuse to think, or are not allowed to think. It is a question of not having anything to do it with.

    • NoCrud

      It’s an element of the Herd Mentality that we see manifest with Unions:

      Either you stay in line or you do not belong.

  • Karen169

    The liberals scream separation of church and state then in turn come into church territory declare the biblical teachings on abortion, homosexuality, etc… to be political issues, then tell Christians they have no right to speak out against those issues. I am glad that Dana exposed the other’s hypocrisy.

    • timmyT

      Remember, God destroyed the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah for the same homosexual stuff that is going on today. Do you not think that a just God will NOT do the same thing to America ?? I believe He will and there is not one thing these perverted liberals can do about it except repent.

  • $100468061

    The only way to defeat Marxists is to use the tactics of Martin Luther King against them. Peaceful but FIRM and fearless resistance in a unified front to overturn or “disobey” their minions in DC would almost certainly force them to resort to violence first – effectively “outing” them for who they really are. The radical Left are peaceful now ONLY because they get their way constantly. And the American people are soooooo dumbed down and apathetic or misdirected that they can’t see what is happening to them in plain sight. Massive civil resistance to thwart their activities would almost certainly arouse their ire, just as Bull Conner was goaded into his extreme measures by the Birmingham marchers.

    Marxists the world over throughout history resorted to violence immediately or early on, because they were RESISTED by either political opponents or the population at large. Marxists in America are not violent because they are WINNING the hearts and minds of the people in an incremental fashion. And because they have captured the institutions and power centers of the culture and government FIRST to turn them against the people.

    The revolution in America is unique in all of history. Why? Because it is being fought from the INSIDE OUT. The radicals are inside the castle, and are now seeking to burst out and take over the countryside to the furthest frontiers. They took the castle by stealth and treachery, over a long period of time. In 1968, they made their first overt appearances in the wake of the turmoil of that decade. What followed???? Violence! Bill Ayers. The Weathermen. The SDS…. the Black Panthers…. etc. But they realized they had jumped the gun to armed revolution and were too eager to overthrow a country that was not yet ready. They retreated into the background again. Who convinced them to do this? Why?

    Because they knew America could be taken without a struggle if they only bided their time and worked on the inside.

  • Phyllis Booth-Finnegan

    Talking to these new hybrid liberals is like playing chase or tag, while getting off and on a merry-go-round, while it’s moving. You just have to let em go. Their minds are way too busy saying wheeee!
    In all seriousness, is like who’s on first. If they willingly choose to go on a TV show, or a blog, or write an article, and knowingly seek to assault, defame, destroy, people who don’t share their OPINION, because that’s all it really is, AND call those people racists, or bigots, they,
    are IN FACT, racist, demeaning, hate mongering bigots. Using hate speech, racism, and bigotry, to point out another’s alleged hate speech, racism and bigotry, I hate to tell them, is in fact, 100 percent racism, hate speech and bigotry. They are right where they belong….as the guilty ALWAYS speak first.

  • Hellhound

    I hope Jessica enjoys her eternal stay in Hell.

  • froggy

    The D-evil Inspires modern medicine to cure the diseases of the homosexual legacy .

    • NoCrud

      It’s parallel to the great effort to go to science and the end of space to find the origins of the Big Bang: It is because they do not want to believe the Bible record.

      As an aside, HIV/AIDS has statistically proved to be spread mostly by drug-using homozectuals. This has been documented and has been written in books about the disease.

  • NoCrud

    Does Fox News like in-your-face controversy? You bet! Otherwise, they would have a true debate atmosphere and not allow but one person at a time to talk. And we know how Union-Mentality Democrats love to run their big mouths, huh? And when either of them tried to overtalk the other, Martha MacCallum should have stopped them immediately.

    Aside from that, I knew that the Democrat/Liberal twit would be right in there with the “last and only word” tactic of over-talking the Conservative. It’s what the Democrats know, it’s what they do.

    Reading the dialog between the two opponents is where you get the real truth of what was said. And the author’s comment that most Christians are pro-life and against gay marriage was right on the mark. Plus the last sentence is also primo. ((Why am I not allowed to copy/paste the comment into this comment without a mad effort to post it to some other media? I am not on Facebook, Twitter, etc.))

  • froggy

    Liberal ,Homo , “WHATS THE DIFFERENCE”

  • froggy

    OOPS ,I meant to say “WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE “sound familiar ?

    • NoCrud

      Just a hint:

      You can edit to add to or remove any part of YOUR comment by using the Edit button at the bottom of YOUR comment that is beside the Reply button.

  • NoCrud

    Here is what happened in that “debate” when you saw the Democrat Bigot go wild with her name-calling:

    “You know you are getting to a Liberal when they start throwing things and calling you names.”
    — Ann Coulter

    • seeymour kleerly

      Seems to me that almost every Conservative reply to a Liberal is full of childish invective! The word Obama must have at least three goofy negative adjectives and a couple of isms! No?

  • gai2012

    I like how these Christian Brothers were called extremists. The Bible is The Word of God but to believe what’s in the Bible which has been in the Bible for over 5, 0000 yrs. Is all of a sudden extremist. You know these liberal DEMONIC DEMOCRAT/COMMUNIST’S know better but they have to demonize CHRISTIANS, MARRIAGE between a man & a women, family values, jibs, the CONSTITUTION, & anyone that can take care of themselves. THEY ARE A DISGRACE TO THE HUMAN RACE. PLAIN DISGUSTING!
    PRAISE GOD that the Battle is the Lord’s & He will take these degenerates out or change their hearts.


  • hayrake

    Liberals just plain love everything twisted and have zero tolerance for anything good. Yet they scream at the top of their lungs that the problem is with everyone else. With ANY one else. The problem is NEVER with them. What a bunch of spoiled brats.

  • Verdes Lutz

    The anti-Christian activists are BIGOTS by definition because they display animus toward Christians, hate them, are unwilling to accept or respect them, and try to destroy their lives. Americans should realize that these people are NO-ONE’S friends! And this is what you can expect from “gays.” It is NOT normal. Not to mention all of the activist federal judges who are overruling the voters re: same sex marriage and destroying American democracy on the PRETENSE that laws banning same are unconstitutional. I defy anyone to show where in the Constitution banning same sex marriage is unconstitutional. Only gullible, foolish Americans are willing to believe this. Do you really think this is as far as the activism will go … that even more important things that we take for granted will not also be at stake? This trend is very dangerous to the nation. And, no-one should expect Christians to take it lying down. We’re not “tourists” as Rambo once said.

  • marmo43

    We as Christians are suppose to fold and cave to the liberal agenda. Jesus never folded or caved, He threw the money changers out of the temple. He exhibited anger at the breaking of God’s laws. Homosexuality is breaking God’s law. Men are not to lie with men and women not to lie with women. It is an abomination. And those who do such things will be turned over to a reprobate (evil) mind. And yet God loves them and hates the sin. The bigots are the libs who say we should tolerate yet they will not do the same. I for one stand with these brothers

  • Alondra

    Liberal Jessica is an anti-Christian BIGOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    And for her information, and whoever has her FALSE views, if someone who clames to be a “Christian” and in the same time justifies and supports the Sexual PERVERSION and the MURDER of the IINNOCENT DEFENSELESS Human Babies is NOT a “Christian”. They are the sons and daughters of the Devil, and that including Jessica. These statements are from the TRUE Christian Book — the Bible — the God’s Word:

    “You ARE of your father the devil, and the DESIRES OF YOUR FATHER YOU WANT TO DO. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does NOT STAND IN THE TRUTH, because THERE IS NO TRUTH IN HIM. When he speaks a LIE, he speaks from his own resources, for HE IS a LIAR AND the FATHER OF IT. (John 8:44)


  • Sam

    I must be a radical bigot because I don’t believe in gay marriage and I think that gays are mentally ill. I love God and I do my best to obey Him. I don’t hate gays but I do hate the homo behavior. It’s sick.

    • Texas John

      I completely agree with you Sam. But I take a step further, by feeling sorry for them because they accept the lie that satan is feeding them. And most of them are on some kind of depression, or illegal drugs or drink heavily because they are so mixed up. So, I pray that God will open up their mind to the truth.

  • old_salty_dawg99

    No LIBERALS hate us for that FACT that we have brains while it s abundantly clear they do not. I do not hate those who want to live a LIE such as that Gay life s not a choice which it is clearly is. Or that abortion is not the MURDER of the unborn which it clearly is. I feel sorry for them and I want to help them by telling hem about CHRIST. Now I now that LIBRALS HATE me and those like me because they cannot stand the guilt they feel for their LIES and the way they live. They feel guilty because they know they are WRONG which they hate being but since they are always that way WRONG so they should be used to it by now.

  • Alleged-Comment

    Looks like Dana has been reading my comments. (Well, all great minds think alike.) LOL!

    Yes, it has nothing to do with them liking sodomites so they die under 40 of horrible AIDS or approving the death of 50 million babies, or the treatment of women as chattel under Islam, but everything to do of their HATRED of, and towards, Christianity.

    Can I have a DUHHH moment here?

  • barto

    Erlich is a prime example of “you can’t fix stupid”.

  • TimAZ

    Maybe this is the tact we should take? Turning the other cheek never accomplished anything for me outside of family.

    • paulrph1

      Even God put a limit on how many times one has to turn the other cheek. Have the limits been met yet?

  • monacall

    Good going Dana. Agree anti Christian bigots.

  • Down to Earth Thinking

    So if you don’t agree with the gay agenda you are a bigot and homophobe and should be punished immediately ? Just more examples of the brain police and control freaks at work trying to control you and your thoughts. I will never submit. There is no law or valid reason to even bring this into any political debate ? Just more control mechanisms being created to use against you and more illusions.

  • ABBAsFernando

    All who oppose Christianity worship SATAN. Barbarian behavior is self destructive and more than this destroys FREEDOM and LIBERTY. For only a Christian moral society respecting the RIGHTS and PROPERTY of others can be FREE.

    • paulrph1

      Right to be free. I see nothing that any of them have ever done that promotes freedom of any kind. It is always take away, restrict and enslave. The latter being their ultimate goal. What they claim and what they promote are exactly opposite.

      • ABBAsFernando

        It really is this basic. Good versus EVIL!

  • saynotoliberals

    I wouldn’t call them anti-Christian I would call them what the Bible say that they are – haters of God.

    • seeymour kleerly

      Just haters of RELIGION!

      • Melissa

        Haters of Life.

        Life comes from God. All those who hate God, love death.

        Proverbs 8

        33 Hear instruction, and be wise, and refuse it not.
        35 For whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall obtain favor of the LORD.
        36 But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death.

        • seeymour kleerly

          You forgot to link God with Religion! You can’t.

  • sfcpete


  • Libertarian Soldier

    Actually, you should stop calling them “liberal” of “liberals”, as if they were open minded, free thinking, accepting of new ideas, accepting of others’ thoughts and speech. They are not! That’s left-speak! Those are pretty words about the left by the left. They are radical, angry, oppressive left. That does not make the Constitution or conservatism “right”. It is not. How do you call liberty and freedom right wing, as if we were monarchists, fascists, nazis or islamists?That is the right wing. Again, I ask, “How is liberty and freedom right wing?” Stop talking left-speak!

    Don’t argue with haters. Set them straight. Stop letting them dictate the narrative. That’s not a conversation.

    Get out in front and let them know, whatever these people say that open conversations, opinions and beliefs are not the worst thing in the world to have. Racism, sexism and the right wing (aside from islam) have little power in our country.

    The left hates individualism; they hate free speech; they hate the love of Christ and the God of the Abraham; They hate morality. Absent morality, they have only one issue to capture the imagination of the masses and it’s a divisive lie. It is the quasi-moralistic issue of equality, marriage equality, race equality, sex equality, income equality, outcome equality, privilege, the identity politics, politics of envy, politics of hate!

    The real intolerant people, the real racist people, the real misogynistic people, the anti-white, anti-employment, anti-law abiding, anti-moral, anti-Chrisitan, anti-Semitic, anti-tax paying, anti-success, haters hate the love that flows from these brothers. These brothers have no political agenda and they did not bring one to their show. They brought love and caring for their brothers and sisters. I can see how that might be “disturbing” and how it might be considered a political weapon to political hatemongers and dividers if I put on my political, divisive hater hat on.

    They did not bring what they were accused of. Is love a political party? I don’t know but you won’t find much in the guard out in front of the democrats.. You need to pin down the haters. Call them on it when they make baseless, blanket, generalized, prejudiced accusations. Do not allow them to steer the conversation into a defense of a character assassination. That’s a conversation ender.

    Don’t get involved in the psychopathy of sociopaths and the habitual slander of collectivist ideologues. Once you allow them to say you’re homophobic (a psychological diagnosis they aren’t qualified to give) or a racist, with no evidence, according to the definition, whatsoever, all you can do is defend.

    Look at the record. Democrats have historically been the racists of history. While I’m not a republican and right now, the republicans are only slightly less left wing as the democrats, look at the history of these two organizations:

    Democrats fought a war against the abolition of slavery until 1865. The democrats created the enforcement arm of their party, the hatemongers of the KKK. The democrats fought the mid 1960s’ civil rights movement while the republicans were on the opposite side of the equation in each of these movements.

    For a time, there were moral democrats. Many were not realists and that continues to permeate the consciousness of the democrats but they are back to being the divisive entity they always were. Their fight is based in their own masked, race hatred. Their message is racism but the purveyors of racism are the race baiting, race hustling democrats that have started fighting the 50 year old movement ex post facto or de facto, after it’s over.

    That’s not to say that there are not racists but only the racists of the democrat ick party cult seem to be driving the dishonest racism narrative. If someone registered in a conservative party or that tends to be a known conservative says something off color or even innocent, they are set upon while those that call themselves “liberal”, daily, openly says anything racist, they get a pass. They’re immune to what the intolerant left has for conservatives, no matter what a conservative’s race is. It is the left that is racist, sexist, ignorant, intolerant and bigoted. Tolerance is only for those that agree with them.

    Let’s not get into what the 1st Amendment says and the mistaken belief that the 1st Amendment only applies to law enforcement and the government. The 1st Amendment was written for times like these and the Schumers, Reids and Pelosis of Congress intend to take a vote on amending it! I don’t see the propaganda ministry (the media) reporting on it so it’s going to take a lot of people by surprise when the Reid and Schumer run Senate brings it to vote.

    They’re talking about “preserving democracy and one man-one vote” while conservatives are fighting for the same thing, one person, one vote per candidate or issue, once and once, only.

    Say what you think, people and don’t let these people call you right wing. For heaven’s sake stop calling yourselves “the right”! Stop the left-speak and take the language back!

    • disqus_XK9gIx2U7h

      Great post !!!

    • Melissa

      “Left-speak” I LIKE IT! I also like “Orwellian speak” and “Newspeak”. “Newspeak” is straight from the book, 1984.

      • Libertarian Soldier

        Thank you. What I didn’t do is address the “what if it was a political agenda?” Is Erlich the police of political beliefs? She begins with “sad and disturbing” and “two attention-seeking reality television wannabe appearing brothers who are political activists who have an extreme agenda, and are trying to cloak it in this, sort of, you know, religious freedom characterization…”

        She begins with an angry, hateful, inaccurate, character assassination! Has she appointed herself Czar of what’s politically correct, what views may or may not be advanced through the vehicle of this stage. Who is she, anyway?

        She goes on to say, “They are anti-abortion and anti-homosexuality and those are their positions. Those are not the positions of most Christians, and for you to say that (anti-Christian bigotry) is outrageous.”

        What if their agenda is political? What then? Does this mean that they have to leave public life, give up their possessions, be banned for life from the television, unable to continue or work with anybody in TV?

        Has anybody here empowered this woman to question and to find it “sad and disturbing” that someone else, someone that may or may not have a political opinion that does or does not agree with her own?

        What the heck is that about and why didn’t Dana hit her there? This is censorship, no matter how you put it and I reject the idea that most Christians are pro-gay marriage and pro-abortion. When did support of family values, traditional marriage and the sanctity of life, to protect the most vulnerable lives become “extreme”? She doesn’t speak for Christians, certainly not me and not the two that aren’t out disparaging these two moral men.

        I’ve studied Constitutional law for some time and I can’t understand the theory that the Bill of Rights only applies to government entities or those regulated by government entities. It is my belief that although the Bill of Rights did have tyranny of government in mind, I believe that there should be consideration given when it is not government that is acting tyrannical but when government is so overreaching and so tyrannical that private citizens and individuals in and out of government develop the same mindset as the tyrannical government and or party in power that they act to be within the same culture as an oppressive government or leader.

        Nobody has the right to censor, to violate the Bill of Rights. Free speech is a right not to be censored by anybody, not the government and not its oppressive, ideologue minions. Freedom of religions, including free speech is also a God given, natural right and the neither the government nor its oppressive ideologue minions may usurp these God given, natural rights, either. Private citizens may not take license to oppress our rights any more than the government does. Private citizens have been prosecuted for the violation of rights of other citizens. I reject the idea that private citizens and businesses aligned with political ideologue organizations believe they can oppress and that they have a right to do so against conflicting, prevailing rights!

        This needs to be addressed! Say no to censorship!

    • Melissa

      I just had a heated political argument with the man that takes care of our lawn.

      No, he is NOT an illegal alien. He is NOT a Mexican. He is a white, retired, business man who supports himself with his own lawn maintenance business and general hauling. He has been working for my husband and me for about 10-years.

      He was complaining about the economy, and said things are NOT getting better. I told him Obama had deliberately done everything possible to make a cyclical recession as bad as possible. He came back that Obama was not at fault, that it was all BUSH’S FAULT! That Bush was the worst president the country had ever had.

      Ordinarily, I would not have engaged such ignorance, but I decided recently that I would be just as vehement, just as passionate, and just as unreasonable as any person on the Left. I decided I would NOT allow ignorant statements to go unchallenged.

      We argued for about 10 minutes, he finally laughed and said, “Well, I guess we can’t discuss politics”. He threw up his hands and walked away. Score one for the good guys!

      I intend to frustrate them just as much as they have frustrated me. Hopefully, they will eventually get sick of arguing.

      • Truth Preacher

        Good job! These idiots need to be BLASTED without fear! We have the moral highground, we have the truth, so we ought to walk, talk and act like it. Liberals are communist traitors and deserve that it be shouted from the rooftops


    Jessica is not quite clear on the concept of freedom of religion and speech…her lack of forethought when she speaks out her butt seems to weaken her point…..

  • Melissa

    How about anti-marriage bigots as well?

    “Marriage” for thousands of years was understood to mean a union of one (unrelated) man and one (unrelated) woman. Trying to change that into something unrecognizable by adding same sex unions, polygamous unions, incestuous unions, etc. makes one an ANTI-MARRIAGE BIGOT.

  • quarkie009

    The Lord performed the first marriage on this earth between Adam (male) and Eve (female) and commanded them to multiply and fill the earth. That commandment has not been revoked. Those that accept unions between two males or two females and call it marriage are completely wrong. Any Christian supporting the LGBT lifestyle is
    coming out in open rebellion against God. You are on the Lord’s side or Satan’s, People must make a choice as to what type of life they want to live. Every person WILL be held accountable to Jesus Christ as to the type of life they want to live. Choose wisely as to what future you want to have.

    • Jim

      There are only two sides: Right or Wrong; God or satan! Choose wisely!

  • Micky Baker

    Erlich is a typical bigot.

  • Micky Baker

    Erlich, you were the one being rude you stupid illiterate left winger!

  • sreynolds

    ALL liberals ARE anti Christian bigots. PERIOD liberalism IS ANTI CHRISTIAN and ANTI AMERICAN…

  • jwherman

    Most Christians don’t think Pro-life and Gay Marriage…???!! She is the one who is hiding HER political positions behind HER so-called Christian curtain

  • richardcancemi

    Can’t Liberals, like this woman supporting the Progressive Socialism Agenda hear themselves? The seem to see themselves as holier-than-thou yet condemn anyone and anything that does not conform to their agenda. They are the most intolerant people.

  • Truth Preacher

    The liberal is, as always A LYING MORON!

  • Truth Preacher

    Liberals are such vile, lying, filthy, immoral perverts and trash.

  • Nancy Sternberg

    Real Christians support life, traditional marriage. Abortion destroys life and no life comes out of gay marriage. Nothing but disease.

  • adrianvance

    Socialists must have someone to hate. Remember Hitler? He was the original National Socialist.

    Come see us at The Two Minute Conservative via Google or at When you speak fine ladies will swoon and liberal gentlemen will weep.

  • Rick

    I once heard that liberals love all things diverse; except opinion. There is only one ‘correct’ way of thinking to liberals. Those who differ must be a _______(insert derogatory term here). The tactic is to either shame you into submission or regulate you to a meaningless gnat to be annoyed by and despised by the general public. Even religion itself must conform their views or be attacked and condemned.

  • Rick

    It was carefully planned and masterfully executed with the help of hollywood and the media. They began desensitizing children a generation ago through popular TV shows and an army of liberal teachers and professors. Then they began pushing their agenda with this young generation, who in turn began to sheepfully push it upon the older generations. This agenda is far from over, as ‘acceptence’ of their deviant nature was never the ultimate goal. They want to remake society into their image. It was all spelled out in “after the ball”. Google it.

  • Rick

    After the Ball–Why the Homosexual Movement Has Won ^ | June 3, 2004 | Dr. R. Albert Mohler, Jr.

    Posted on 6/4/2004 9:38:28 AM by sauerkraut

    The spectacular success of the homosexual movement stands as one of the most fascinating phenomena of our time. In less than two decades, homosexuality has moved from “the love that dares not speak its name,” to the center of America’s public life. The homosexual agenda has advanced even more quickly than its most ardent proponents had expected, and social change of this magnitude demands some explanation.

    A partial explanation of the homosexual movement’s success can be traced to the 1989 publication of After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s. Published with little fanfare, this book became the authoritative public relations manual for the homosexual agenda, and its authors presented the book as a distillation of public relations advice for the homosexual community. A look back at its pages is an occasion for understanding just how successful their plan was.

    Authors Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen combined psychiatric and public relations expertise in devising their strategy. Kirk, a researcher in neuropsychiatry, and Madsen, a public relations consultant, argued that homosexuals must change their presentation to the heterosexual community if real success was to be made.

    Conceiving their book as a “gay manifesto for the 1990s,” the authors called for homosexuals to repackage themselves as mainstream citizens demanding equal treatment, rather than as a promiscuous sexual minority seeking greater opportunity and influence.

    Writing just as the AIDS crisis hit its greatest momentum, the authors saw the disease as an opportunity to change the public mind. “As cynical as it may seem, AIDS gives us a chance, however brief, to establish ourselves as a victimized minority legitimately deserving of America’s special protection and care,” they wrote.

    Give them credit: they really did understand the operation of the public mind. Kirk and Madsen called for homosexuals to talk incessantly about homosexuality in public. “Open, frank talk makes gayness seem less furtive, alien, and sinful; more above board,” they asserted. “Constant talk builds the impression that public opinion is at least divided on the subject, and that a sizeable bloc–the most modern, up-to-date citizens–accept or even practice homosexuality.”

    Nevertheless, not all talk about homosexuality is helpful. “And when we say talk about homosexuality, we mean just that. In the early stages of the campaign, the public should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behavior itself. Instead, the imagery of sex per se should be downplayed, and the issue of gay rights reduced, as far as possible, to an abstract social question.”

    Portraying homosexuals as victims was essential to their strategy. Offering several principles for tactical advance in their cause, the authors called upon homosexuals to “portray gays as victims of circumstance and depression, not as aggressive challengers.” This would be necessary, they argued, because “gays must be portrayed as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to adopt the role of protector.”

    Such a strategy could, they asserted, lead to something like a “conversion” of the public mind on the question of homosexuality. “The purpose of victim imagery is to make straights feel very uncomfortable; that is, to jam with shame the self-righteous pride that would ordinarily accompany and reward their antigay belligerence, and to lay groundwork for the process of conversion by helping straights identify with gays and sympathize with their underdog status.”

    Obviously, this would mean marginalizing some members of the homosexual community. Kirk and Madsen were bold to advise a mainstreaming of the homosexual image. “In practical terms, this means that cocky mustachioed leather-men, drag queens, and bull dykes would not appear in gay commercials and other public presentations. Conventional young people, middle-age women, and older folks of all races would be featured, not to mention the parents and straight friends of gays.” Furthermore, “It cannot go without saying, incidentally, that groups on the farthest margins of acceptability, such as NAMBLA [North American Man-Boy Love Association], must play no part at all in such a campaign. Suspected child molesters will never look like victims.”

    What about the origin of sexual orientation? The success of the homosexual movement can be largely traced to the very idea of “orientation” itself. More precisely, homosexuals advanced their cause by arguing that they were born that way. Madsen and Kirk offer this as candid public relations advice. “We argue that, for all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been born gay–even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence.” Alas, “To suggest in public that homosexuality might be chosenis to open the can of worms labeled ‘moral choices and sin’ and give the religious intransigents a stick to beat us with. Straights must be taught that it is as natural for some persons to be homosexual as it is for others to be heterosexual: wickedness and seduction have nothing to do with it.”

    There can be no doubt that Christianity represents the greatest obstacle to the normalization of homosexual behavior. It cannot be otherwise, because of the clear biblical teachings concerning the inherent sinfulness of homosexuality in all forms, and the normativity of heterosexual marriage. In order to counter this obstacle, Kirk and Madsen advised gays to “use talk to muddy the moral waters, that is, to undercut the rationalizations that ‘justify’ religious bigotry and to jam some of its psychic rewards.” How can this be done? “This entails publicizing support by moderate churches and raising serious theological objections to conservative biblical teachings. It also means exposing the inconsistency and hatred underlying antigay doctrines.”

    Conservative churches, defined by the authors as “homohating” are portrayed as “antiquated backwaters, badly out of step with the times and with the latest findings of psychology.”

    A quick review of the last 15 years demonstrates the incredible effectiveness of this public relations advice. The agenda set out by Kirk and Madsen led to nothing less than social transformation. By portraying themselves as mainstream Americans seeking nothing but liberty and self-fulfillment, homosexuals redefined the moral equation. Issues of right and wrong were isolated as outdated, repressive, and culturally embarrassing. Instead, the assertion of “rights” became the hallmark of the public relations strategy.

    Other principles offered by the authors included making gays look good by identifying strategic historical figures as being hidden homosexuals, and, on the other hand, making “victimizers” look bad in the public eye. Kirk and Madsen suggested isolating conservative Christians by presenting them as “hysterical backwoods preachers, drooling with hate to a degree that looks both comical and deranged.” They offered a concrete example of how this strategy could be used on television and in print. “For example, for several seconds an unctuous beady-eyed Southern preacher is shown pounding the pulpit in rage against ‘those perverted, abominable creatures.'” While his tirade continues over the soundtrack, the picture switches to heart-rending photos of badly beaten persons, or of gays who look decent, harmless, and likeable; and then we cut back to the poisonous face of the preacher. The contrast speaks for itself. The effect is devastating.”

    Public relations is now a major part of the American economy, with hundreds of millions of dollars poured into advertising strategies and image enhancement programs. Observers of the public relations world must look back with slack-jawed amazement at the phenomenal success of the approach undertaken by homosexuals over the last two decades. The advice offered by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen is nothing less than a manifesto for moral revolution. A look back at this strategy indicates just how self-consciously the homosexual movement advanced its cause by following this plan.

    Those who oppose the normalization of homosexuality have indeed been presented as backwoods, antiquated, and dangerous people, while those advancing the cause are presented as forces for light, progress, and acceptance. Conservative Christians have indeed been presented as proponents of hatred rather than as individuals driven by biblical conviction. The unprecedented success of this public relations strategy helps to explain why America has accepted everything from homosexual characters and plotlines in prime-time entertainment to the lack of outrage in response to same-sex marriage in Massachusetts.

    At least we know what we are up against. Biblical Christians must continue to talk about right and wrong even when the larger world dismisses morality as an outdated concept. We must maintain marriage as a non-negotiable norm–a union of a man and a woman–even when the courts redefine marriage by fiat. At the same time, we must take into account the transformation of the American mind that is now so devastatingly evident to all who have eyes to see.

    The real tragedy of After the Ball is that the great result of this is not a party, but the complete rejection of the very moral foundations which made this society possible. In order to address the most fundamental problems, we must understand the shape of the American mind. Looking back at After the Ball after fifteen years, it all comes into frightening focus.

    • Rick

      This was written 10 years ago when states were first enacting laws and amendments to define marriage as between a man and woman, most overwhelmingly approved by the public. 10 years later we have seen the agenda mercilessly attack these under the ‘equal rights’ veil mentioned. What will be the way america looks even 10 more years from now?

Don't Miss Out!!

Get your daily dose of Eagle Rising by entering your email address below.

Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become an insider.

Send this to a friend