The Obama “Library” is actually an Obama campaign center and federal funds may pay for it.
I’ve already written about one lawsuit against the Obama Campaign Center, a.k.a the Obama Library. That was an environmental lawsuit. There is also an ongoing First Amendment lawsuit against the “library.” For one thing, it’s not a presidential library. It’s a political center for recruiting and training Leftist activists. As a result, some people are suing because the government is forcing them to pay for Liberal propaganda.
Only now has it become apparent that federal taxpayers, not Illinois taxpayers, will be funding most of the public support for the controversial Obama Center to be built on Chicago’s Southside.
The center was initially pitched as a privately funded presidential library. Many Illinois taxpayers therefore were angered to learn that at least $174 million was included in the state’s 1,246-page budget presented in May to rank and file General Assembly members only hours before their vote. Nor will the center be a presidential library.
However, it turns out that federal taxpayers will be the ones compelled to make the subsidy. The Illinois appropriation is for roadway and transit reconfigurations needed to accommodate the center, and 80% of such spending is generally reimbursable by the federal government. Wirepoints has confirmed with state officials that federal reimbursement of at least $139 million is highly likely.
Stoking the controversy is the stated mission of the center, which is partly political. The Original Request for Proposals said the center would “enhance the pursuit of [President Obama’s] initiatives beyond 2017.” Former President Obama has further commented to the same effect. As the Chicago Tribune put it, “As he’s long maintained, Obama said he envisions his center as a place where young people from around the world can meet each other, get training and prepare to become the next generation of leaders.”
The center is already subject to a federal lawsuit with a First Amendment claim based on taxpayer support for a private, political purpose.
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com