The mainstream media has gone from claiming Donald Trump threatens the First Amendment to attacking it themselves!
The New York Time says that we on the Right have “weaponized the First Amendment.” As Donald Trump Jr astutely noted, the Fake News Media is actually turning against free speech altogether:
Only in the alternative universe that the failing New York Times lives in, could this story not be titled:
“How the Left Gave Up on the 1st Amendment.”
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) July 1, 2018
If you read this horrible “report” (really an editorial) you’ll notice some shifting going on. On the one hand they begin with some history of some arguments about the First Amendment only protecting political speech. But even that, controversial as it is, is not the full truth. The truth is that the New York Times and the Left is pushing for the position that political speech is especially dangerous and in need of regulation.
Their view of the First Amendment now matches their view of the Second. They oppose both!
The New York Times reports, “How Conservatives Weaponized the First Amendment.”
On the final day of the Supreme Court term last week, Justice Elena Kagan sounded an alarm.
The court’s five conservative members, citing the First Amendment, had just dealt public unions a devastating blow. The day before, the same majority had used the First Amendment to reject a California law requiring religiously oriented “crisis pregnancy centers” to provide women with information about abortion.
Conservatives, said Justice Kagan, who is part of the court’s four-member liberal wing, were “weaponizing the First Amendment.”[…]
And an increasingly conservative judiciary has been more than a little receptive to this argument. A new analysis prepared for The New York Times found that the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. has been far more likely to embrace free-speech arguments concerning conservative speech than liberal speech. That is a sharp break from earlier eras.[…]
Some liberals now say that free speech disproportionately protects the powerful and the status quo.
“When I was younger, I had more of the standard liberal view of civil liberties,” said Louis Michael Seidman, a law professor at Georgetown. “And I’ve gradually changed my mind about it. What I have come to see is that it’s a mistake to think of free speech as an effective means to accomplish a more just society.”
To the contrary, free speech reinforces and amplifies injustice, Catharine A. MacKinnon, a law professor at the University of Michigan, wrote in “The Free Speech Century,” a collection of essays to be published this year.
“Once a defense of the powerless, the First Amendment over the last hundred years has mainly become a weapon of the powerful,” she wrote. “Legally, what was, toward the beginning of the 20th century, a shield for radicals, artists and activists, socialists and pacifists, the excluded and the dispossessed, has become a sword for authoritarians, racists and misogynists, Nazis and Klansmen, pornographers and corporations buying elections.”
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com