Trey Gowdy RIPS Comey and the FBI

If I am ever in court as a witness, I hope the person doing the cross-examination is NOT Trey Gowdy. The guy’s questioning is brutal. During his questioning of Inspector General Horowitz, He not only poked some significant holes in the IG report’s conclusion that the outcome of the Clinton investigation had nothing to do with bias, but he began with an opening statement that eviscerated former FBI Director James Comey.

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) the ranking  Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, said the reason for the hearings is that Republicans seemed fixated on finding Clinton guilty of some wrongdoing. “All their howling about ‘lock her up’ was bogus, it was baseless, it was unsubstantiated,” he said. “Now we have another report saying so, but again and again, the Republicans refuse to accept this conclusion.”

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), who during the Iran debate proved that he would place his children on guillotines for the party and a free ride on an airplane with Obama added that Republicans seemed “stuck at a perpetual Trump campaign rally, chanting ‘lock her up.’”

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Eagle Rising updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

But with his questioning of IG Horowitz Gowdy showed that the investigation of Hillary’s emails was feeble, and built a convincing case that the FBI let Clinton off easy and their motivation for the soft touch was bias.

He closed his questioning with an incredibly powerful point:

My time is up I hope one of my other colleagues will explore that because the explanation I’ve heard is that the failure to prosecute was predicated upon their belief that there was not sufficient evidence of intent on her behalf and I don’t know where in the hell you would go to find better evidence of intent than interviewing the person who actually was doing the intending and when you make up your mind that you’re not going to charge someone and you make up your mind that you need to not go in “loaded for bear”  and then you read the 302 and there’s not a single damn question on intent it is really hard for those of us who used to do this for a living to not conclude they’d made up their mind on intent before they even bothered to talk to the best repository of intent evidence which would be her.

Gowdy’s full questioning is below and is well worth your time to watch,

Below that is another must watch video, Gowdy’s opening statement which eviscerated former FBI head, James Comey.  Referring to IG findings that Comey was insubordinate in his handling of the Clinton email case, Gowdy accused the ex-director of essentially operating by his own rules.“…he appointed himself FBI director, attorney general, special counsel, lead investigator and the general arbiter of what is good and right in the world according to him.”

Sadly, Trey Gowdy is leaving Congress after this session.  It would be great if President trump finds a way to add him to the Administration. America needs Trey Gowdy.

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com


About the author

Jeff Dunetz

Jeff Dunetz

Jeff is a Journalist, Blogger and one of the rare Jewish conservatives in a sea of north east liberal Jews (Thanksgiving dinner is a real pip). Jeff was honored with the 2014 Not For Profit Blogger of the Year award by the National Blogger's Club, is editor/publisher of The Lid (Lidblog.com), contributing reporter at MRCTV.org and Political Columnist for the newspaper, The Jewish Star.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Send this to a friend