A federal judge rejected a delay in the court case against the notorious Russian troll farm.
The Russian troll farm case represents what is now the second court defeat of the Mueller investigation.
Soon after a federal judge accused the Mueller investigation of “lying” and demanding to see the “scope memo”–the documentation that spelled out the Mueller probe’s area of investigation—another federal judge refused the Mueller investigation’s request for a delay in the Russian troll farm case. Adding insult to injury, the judge refused to give any explanation for the delay.
Politico reports, “Judge rejects Mueller’s request for delay in Russian troll farm case.”
In a brief order Saturday evening, U.S. District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich offered no explanation for her decision to deny a request prosecutors made Friday to put off the scheduled Wednesday arraignment for Concord Management and Consulting, one of the three firms charged in the case.
The 13 people charged in the high-profile indictment in February are considered unlikely to ever appear in a U.S. court. The three businesses accused of facilitating the alleged Russian troll farm operation — the Internet Research Agency, Concord Management, and Concord Catering — were also expected to simply ignore the American criminal proceedings.
Last month, however, a pair of Washington-area lawyers suddenly surfaced in the case, notifying the court that they represent Concord Management. POLITICO reported at the time that the move appeared to be a bid to force Mueller’s team to turn over relevant evidence to the Russian firm and perhaps even to bait prosecutors into an embarrassing dismissal in order to avoid disclosing sensitive information.
On Friday, Mueller’s prosecutors disclosed that Concord’s attorneys, Eric Dubelier and Kate Seikaly, had made a slew of discovery requests demanding nonpublic details about the case and the investigation. Prosecutors also asked a judge to postpone the formal arraignment of Concord Management set for next week.
The prosecution team sought the delay on the grounds that it’s unclear whether Concord Management formally accepted the court summons related to the case.
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com