(Author’s Request: Please share via email—not just social media—due to Big Data’s censorship of conservative content.)
“Those Who Don’t Know History Are Destined To Repeat It. The Masterminds On The Left DO KNOW History And Manipulate The Useful Idiots To Repeat It. Hitler Did It FOR THE CHILDREN Too!” —Dr. Marty Fox, posting on Twitter
Those Who Don't Know History Are Destined To Repeat It
— Dr. Marty Fox (@DrMartyFox) March 24, 2018
“For me, trust in the common man is such a basic principle. Few governments actually allow it. They want to keep their people vulnerable and disarmed. I find it awful that people wouldn’t be allowed to protect themselves.” —Joyce Lee Malcolm, one of America’s foremost Second Amendment scholars (https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2018/03/29/the-nice-girl-who-saved-the-second-amendment/)
David Hogg, Fascist Enfant Terrible of the American Left
In March of 2018, America’s version of the Hitler Youth stormed Washington, DC, in its effort to disarm Americans. The anti-Second Amendment march was ostensibly led by David Hogg, the son of an FBI operative (https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/28555-probing-mueller-what-were-his-roles-in-boston-mafia-murders-uranium-one-and-other-fbi-scandals), although, on a deeper level, it is actually being organized and run by the forces of America’s anti-freedom Deep State (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/28/despite-media-narrative-study-says-teenagers-made-up-just-10-percent-march-for-our-lives-crowd.amp.html).
The existence of a fascistic Deep State within the fabric of America’s government has recently become glaringly exposed. The powerful cabal’s attempts to thwart the republic’s choice for Trump as president, to disrupt its corruption and “drain the swamp,” are now being exposed within the intelligence community that was so thoroughly weaponized against the people by Barack Obama during his tenure as president; this community includes, but is not limited to, the Central Intelligence Agency, the State Department, the Justice Department, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The FBI has become primarily an intelligence-gathering operation to protect the Deep State by spying on Americans and sometimes framing them for crimes (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5003775/Boston-lawyer-tells-Mueller-tried-entrap-him.html & https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/28555-probing-mueller-what-were-his-roles-in-boston-mafia-murders-uranium-one-and-other-fbi-scandals). At the same time the Deep State is subverting the republic from within the government, it is also attempting to divide and conquer in the public arena by use of media propaganda (https://www.infowars.com/alternate-reality-viral-propaganda-chart-demonizes-independent-media/), educational indoctrination (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/14/tancredo-report-reveals-massive-indoctrination-students-universities-transformative-civic-engagement/), and corporate fascism (http://money.cnn.com/2018/03/22/news/companies/citigroup-gun-restrictions/index.html). Crisis actor David Hogg (https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8991691/?ref_=nv_sr_2), while far from being a mastermind himself, has become the front man—or perhaps “front child” is more appropriate—for this homegrown national socialist movement that fights against Americans’ right to defend against evil actors, while, in the process, smearing as murderers the members of the National Rifle Association, arguably America’s oldest civil rights group (https://home.nra.org/).
The NRA: Protecting against Evil Requires Good Guys with Guns
One of the main purposes for the existence of the NRA nowadays is to defend the rights of good people with guns to defend themselves. Evil people with guns already have their champions: statist politicians who promise to disarm the law-abiding, thus rendering them defenseless, and people, like David Hogg, who wish to repeal Americans’ right to shoot back are the heroes of all evildoers. Politicians who protect and enable evil always lie about firearms, claiming that defensive weapons in the home and in schools put the lives of children at risk. But as Wayne LaPierre, of the NRA, points out (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/feb/22/nra-wayne-lapierre-gun-control-cpac-speech-2018), “The whole idea from some of our opponents that armed security makes us less safe is completely ridiculous. If that’s true, [and] armed security makes us less safe, let’s just go ahead and remove it from everywhere.” LaPierre goes on to say, “We must immediately harden our schools. Every day young children are being dropped off at schools that are virtually wide open, soft targets for anyone bent on mass murder. It should not be easier for a madman to shoot up a school than a bank or jewellery store or some Hollywood gala. Schools should be the hardest target in this country. Evil must be confronted with all necessary force to protect our kids. . . . To stop a bad guy with a gun, it takes a good guy with a gun.” And, indeed, what does it mean to summon the police? It means waiting for good guys with guns to come.
At Parkland’s Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, the Cowards of Broward—negligent and craven law-enforcement officers—showed up but refused to defend the innocent victims who were relying on them, thus underscoring the fact that it is good people with guns who are needed as defenders, not cowardly or bad people. In Maryland, on the other hand, a good guy with a gun, one Officer Blaine Gaskill, who was at Great Mills High School when an active shooter opened fire, demonstrated his courage and goodness by stopping a would-be murderer from executing a similar massacre, making Wayne LaPierre’s point in real life (https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/school-resource-officer-blaine-gaskill-helped-stop-gunman-at-a-maryland-high-school/2018/03/20/639a8e42-2c66-11e8-b0b0-f706877db618_story.html?utm_term=.b237861c73bc). Guns themselves are neither good nor evil. They are useful tools for both attack and defense. And leaving firearms in the hands of the legally non-compliant attackers, while removing them from the hands of law-abiding defenders, is an evil act. Victim-disarmament laws only end up punishing good people for the acts of bad people, and evil is thereby rewarded by such laws.
National Socialist-Style Armbands & Nazi-Style Salutes
It was not lost on lovers and advocates of freedom that David Hogg has been subtly seeking to make himself and others in his neo-fascist movement look like German National Socialists, right down to the wearing of armbands. According to Squawker (https://squawker.org/culture-wars/david-hogg-and-his-sister-create-communist-like-armbands-to-promote-gun-control/), Hogg has been working with his younger sister Lauren to create armbands for victim-disarmament proponents to wear to school. To quote Squawker, “The band, of course, is to be worn on your arm, and the symbol in the middle resembles a peace sign. But does it really?” A picture of Lauren holding up an armband, stretched out between her hands shows the problematic armbands (https://squawker.org/culture-wars/david-hogg-and-his-sister-create-communist-like-armbands-to-promote-gun-control/).
Apparently, the tweet featuring the armbands was later deleted, perhaps because the “peace and love” armband actually recalls fascist imagery of the 1920s and 1930s. Of course, the look was ruthlessly jeered on Gab (https://gab.ai/KingGoy/posts/21431732), which might be among the reasons the Twitter post was canceled.
Mike Adams of Natural News (https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-03-24-hitler-youth-student-gun-control-march-invades-washington-follows-in-the-footsteps-of-nazis-who-disarmed-the-jews-before-the-holocaust.html) comments about the armbands: “Again, the tweet was deleted because this does not look good for their movement. . . . [W]e have a bunch of people (including myself) laughing at the similarities between these SJW [Social Justice Warrior] armbands and the Nazi armbands. I thought these guys hated Nazis, [so] why are they trying so hard to subtly dress like Hitler?”
Making America Just Like England
So, the Leftist totalitarians that run the Deep State are now hiding behind children in order to use them as human shields against rational arguments being made by Constitutional Conservatives. It is now abundantly clear that there are fascists in our country who wish to disarm the populace, so that the government might be empowered to suspend the Bill of Rights, just as the English government has revoked the famous Rights of Englishmen within two decades of England’s 1997 Gun Ban—which was also marketed as being for the sake of protecting children (http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/march/13/newsid_2543000/2543277.stm). Paul Weston, an English politician, was arrested for quoting Winston Churchill’s criticism of Islam, in The River War, while making a speech (http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/04/29/british-politician-arrested-after-speech-quoting-churchills-take-on-islam.html), illustrating the fact that no free speech exists in England anymore.
An Aside about Churchill’s Truth
Churchill had the opportunity to see Islam close up, and later, in the first edition of his book, The River War, (https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/churchill-on-islam/) exposed terrible truths about Islamic culture: “How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. . . . The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property—either as a child, a wife, or a concubine—must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.” An understanding of Churchill’s warnings, with respect to Islam, lends insight into why Obama’s Muslim family taught him to despise Churchill and why Obama removed Churchill’s bust from the White House (https://eaglerising.com/17063/team-obama-lies-again-they-did-return-the-churchill-bust-despite-their-claims-to-the-contrary/).
And the Children Shall Lead
So, the English government is fast becoming a totalitarian state, if they are not one already, and in exchange for what? The English people—together with their children—are hardly more secure, since gun violence and murder rates have actually increased since—and probably partly due to—the Gun Ban of 1997 (https://johnrlott.blogspot.com/2012/12/so-did-piers-morgan-and-christiane.html).
Totalitarians have a history of using children as shields against criticism, when it comes to snatching human rights away from the populace. “Give up your rights,” they plead, “it’s for the children.” Perhaps the most famous—or infamous—example of a totalitarian leader’s doing this is Adolf Hitler. According to the Gateway Pundit (https://thegatewaypundit.com/2018/03/reminder-hitler-also-used-children-to-promote-gun-control/), “It’s reported that when Hitler signed gun control legislation he surrounded himself with children as a backdrop (https://twitter.com/DrMartyFox/status/977523951973920774).”
The Daily Mail Criticizes Comparisons of David Hogg to Hitler
The Daily Mail (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5551787/Parkland-shooting-survivor-David-Hogg-compared-Hitler.html) has reported that “Parkland school shooting survivor David Hogg is being compared to Hitler (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRi-UouACL8#action=share) after various videos emerged online with the Nazi leader’s voice dubbed over footage of the teenager speaking at the March for Our Lives rally.” The piece is critical of this criticism of Hogg, regardless of the fact that the 17-year-old man-child has actively done much to bring criticism upon himself. The Daily Mail and other Leftist media outlets see it as ironic that news organizations, such as Breitbart News and the Gateway Pundit, which they like to portray as being fascistic themselves, would be critical of Hitler. But the Left is being dishonest, since Hitler was a leftwing socialist himself—just like Bernie Sanders. Hitler’s “Nazi Party” was short for “National Socialist German Workers’ Party,” and Hitler was democratically elected to power before suspending Germany’s constitution during a so-called “national emergency” through the Enabling Act that gave him dictatorial powers (http://www.historyinanhour.com/2011/03/23/enabling-act-summary/).
Hitler and Gun Control
There is much written about Adolf Hitler’s obsession with disarming his victims. Herbert W. Stupp, writing for The American Spectator (https://spectator.org/63424_hitler-and-gun-control/#), puts it this way: “As Weimar leaders were implementing their gun registration initiatives, they stressed how lists of gun owners and registrants had to remain confidential and needed to be kept away from ‘radical elements.’ Less than a year later, Hitler took control of the national government, and his minions did gain possession of the entire national list of gun registrants. The Nazis used the registration lists to identify Jews, Roma, and other ‘enemies’ who possessed firearms, so they could be disarmed.” While many Americans want to cover their eyes and ears, ignoring the threat that stands naked before them, David Hogg and his sponsors have been inextricably linked to Linda Sarsour and Louis Farrakhan (http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/03/parkland-student-takes-on-unhinged-liberal-icon-david-hogg-ties-him-to-womens-march-and-louis-farrakhan/), known Islamo-fascists and anti-Semites. Sarsour (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/19/pamela-geller-linda-sarsours-jihad/) is a Muslim woman who says that no one has the right to tell her that Muslims cannot kill Jews (https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/268841/sarsour-you-have-no-right-tell-us-we-cant-kill-daniel-greenfield), and Farrakhan is a Muslim leader who has made repeated statements that can only be typified as Jew-hating, such as this one (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/19/9-democrat-lawmakers-ties-anti-semite-farrakhan/): “The Jews were responsible for all of this filth and degenerate behavior that Hollywood is putting out, turning men into women and women into men.” Sarsour and Farrakhan would both be apt pupils for Adolf Hitler, had they lived in Nazi Germany in the 1930s and 1940s.
With the current anti-Jewish, anti-Christian sensibility of the Democrat Party, who could deny that it will be Jews and Christians who are first disarmed by any Democrat president who might serve in a post-Second Amendment era? Barack Obama—who said, “We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation”—instructed the US military to target Christian organizations as hate groups (http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/us-army-defines-christian-ministry-domestic-hate-group/). And Hitler once lamented that the Muslims lost the Battle of Tours to Christian forces in October of 732 (https://eaglerising.com/25130/hitlers-last-laugh-angela-merkels-birthing-of-an-islamo-fascist-fourth-reich/): “‘Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers . . . then we [Germans] should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies heroism and which opens up the Seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world.’ According to compatriot Albert Speer, Hitler, while criticizing Christianity, said, ‘The Muhammadan religion . . . would have been much more compatible to us [Germans] than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?’” Dennis Prager, in his book Exodus, quotes Herman Rauschning, who was present when Hitler said, “We are fighting against the most ancient curse that humanity has brought upon itself. Against the so-called Ten Commandments, against them we are fighting.”
Ben Carson on Nazi Gun Control
As Dr. Ben Carson pointed out to Wolf Blitzer (https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/ben-carson-schools-idiot-wolf-blitzer-on-gun-control-in-nazi-germany/), an armed Jewish population in pre-war Germany could have made it more difficult for the Nazis to round them all up. According to Daniel Payne, writing for The Federalist (http://thefederalist.com/2015/10/12/ben-carson-is-right-about-nazi-gun-control/), “Adolph Hitler himself knew it: ‘The most foolish mistake we could possibly make,’ he said, ‘would be to allow the subject races to possess arms.’ The Nazi Party was ruthlessly methodical. It knew that disarmament was a pretext to annihilation. You could not easily kill a Jew if he could easily kill you back.” And to those critics who still choose to scoff at the idea of armed resistance against an evil regime, Payne poses this simple, but powerful, question: “If you could be transported back in time and assume the role of a Jew in late-1930s, German-occupied Poland, would you rather be disarmed—or would you rather have a gun?”
The Good People of the NRA Also Understand the Threat of Fascist Tyranny
The Good People of the National Rifle Association helped to fight the fascists during World War Two. Here is some history not often reported nowadays (https://home.nra.org/about-the-nra/): “During World War II, the association offered its ranges to the government, developed training materials, encouraged members to serve as plant and home guard members, and developed training materials for industrial security. NRA members even reloaded ammunition for those guarding war plants. Incidentally, the NRA’s call to help arm Britain in 1940 resulted in the collection of more than 7,000 firearms for Britain’s defense against potential invasion by Germany (Britain had virtually disarmed itself with a series of gun-control laws enacted between World War I and World War II).” Being as pro-freedom and anti-fascist as the NRA is, people on the Left will recognize in them a resolute enemy, and this is why they take such pains to smear and demonize the good men and women of the National Rifle Association. Of course, the Democrat Party, having been captured by the fascist Left, would have as one of its primary goals the disarmament of all freedom-loving Americans.
Good People Cherish the Right to Shoot Back; Evildoers Cherish Victim-Disarmament
If you look at the people in history who were in favor of individual gun rights—in essence, the right to shoot back at gun-toting evildoers—what you find is freedom-loving world leaders who all worked to change the world for the better; and not one of them proposed that disarming the victims would be a step in that direction. The list of humanitarians supporting the right of victims to defend themselves includes the following (https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-03-24-hitler-youth-student-gun-control-march-invades-washington-follows-in-the-footsteps-of-nazis-who-disarmed-the-jews-before-the-holocaust.html): George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, and Martin Luther King, Jr.
Mahatma Gandhi stood firmly against the British law depriving all Indians of their civil right to self-defense, having stated as much in 1918 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_Act,_1959): “Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest.” And, per WND (http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/what-most-dont-know-about-mlk-jr-and-his-guns/), “Dr. Adam Winkler, a professor of constitutional law at UCLA and author of Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America, explained, ‘Most people think King would be the last person to own a gun. Yet in the mid-1950s, as the civil rights movement heated up, King kept firearms for self-protection. In fact, he even applied for a permit to carry a concealed weapon. A recipient of constant death threats, King had armed supporters take turns guarding his home and family.’”
Some leaders who supported victim-disarmament were King George III, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, Kim Jong Il, and Barack Obama. All of these people sought to strip away individual liberties, making the proposition of the future enslavement of their citizens that much easier. The problem with mass gun confiscations is that, inevitably, government-sponsored mass-slaughter typically follows on its heels.
Tyranny Rising: Joyce Lee Malcolm Spells Things Out
In 2008, when the Supreme Court issued its decision in District of Columbia v. Heller (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller), Joyce Lee Malcolm’s research on the Second Amendment https://www.amazon.com/Keep-Bear-Arms-Origins-Anglo-American/dp/0674893077/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8) was cited three times. Malcolm saw the ruling as an important validation of her research. The National Review says this about her (https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2018/03/29/the-nice-girl-who-saved-the-second-amendment/): “A simple idea has motivated her work: ‘For me, trust in the common man is such a basic principle. Few governments actually allow it. They want to keep their people vulnerable and disarmed. I find it awful that people wouldn’t be allowed to protect themselves.’ She also calls attention to a cultural aspect: ‘City people who grew up without guns think it’s just a bunch of rednecks. . . . There’s just so much vilification of the people who want to “cling” to their guns,’ she says, echoing the words of Barack Obama, who as a presidential candidate in 2008 said of rural and working-class whites—future Trump Republicans—that ‘they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them.’ ‘Britain has gone down the road of taking away guns,’ she says. ‘And look where it got them.’ She points to a website of the U.K.’s Police National Legal Database, which includes an online forum called ‘Ask the Police.’ One question inquires about self-defense products. Are any legal? The answer: Only one, a ‘rape alarm’ that looks like a car remote. Its panic button emits a screeching sound. The website also warns against using nontoxic sprays against assailants. If ‘sprayed in someone’s eyes,’ such a chemical ‘would become an offensive weapon.’ In other words, potential rape victims can push panic buttons but must not dare to injure attackers—not with sprays, let alone knives or guns. ‘Can you believe it?’ asks Malcolm. ‘They don’t let people protect themselves.’”
Fascism Looms: Will It Be America’s Future?
Needless to say, there was no free speech in Nazi Germany. Only “politically correct” leftwing speech was tolerated. And all of this was supported by German universities. This is precisely what has been happening at American universities today, such as Berkeley, whose anti-free speech rioting in early 2017 looked eerily similar to Nazi book-burnings (https://eaglerising.com/41082/the-rise-of-fascistic-thuggery-in-america/). It is undeniable that freedom is under attack in America, and it is Democrats and their agents who are generally responsible for carrying out the attacks. The Democrats’ socialist ideology of statist collectivism and command economy are similar to the ideology of the National Socialists in the Germany of the 1930s. Fascism has often been incorrectly labeled as a rightwing phenomenon; but it was Hitler’s antipathy towards Stalin’s brand of socialism—or Communism—that earned Nazi Fascism the reputation of being an opposite form, rather than a rival form, of socialism. As early as the 1980s, Ronald Reagan had already warned America of the threat of fascism from the so-called “liberal” Left (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2sMoykZ-lM). The truth is that the Left does not care about the lives of children—or anyone else’s lives—or they would not oppose defending those lives. President Obama had his children attend a school protected by guns for his entire eight years as president. And Obama had his own life protected by gun-wielding Secret Service agents. So, why is it—when it comes to the President of the United States—that it is safe to protect his children’s lives and his own life with firearms, if it is not safe to do the same thing for the rest of America’s children and adults? This is a question on the minds of all American patriots. And it is an answer the fascists of the Left do not wish be asked—although any child should be able to answer.
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com