Suddenly, we are told there is no real reason to believe Bashar al Assad used chemical weapons on his own people.
Recently, James Mattis revealed that there is no evidence that Assad used chemical weapons in Syria. This is amazing because he knows that we bombed Syria claiming we had evidence of exactly that!
This is definitely a sign that Donald Trump should stick with his campaign promises to keep us out of unnecessary wars and put America first.
Newsweek reports, “Now Mattis Admits There Was No Evidence Assad Used Poison Gas on His People.”
Lost in the hyper-politicized hullabaloo surrounding the Nunes Memorandum and the Steele Dossier was the striking statement by Secretary of Defense James Mattis that the U.S. has “no evidence” that the Syrian government used the banned nerve agent Sarin against its own people.
This assertion flies in the face of the White House (NSC) Memorandum which was rapidly produced and declassified to justify an American Tomahawk missile strike against the Shayrat airbase in Syria.
Mattis offered no temporal qualifications, which means that both the 2017 event in Khan Sheikhoun and the 2013 tragedy in Ghouta are unsolved cases in the eyes of the Defense Department and Defense Intelligence Agency.
Mattis went on to acknowledge that “aid groups and others” had provided evidence and reports but stopped short of naming President Assad as the culprit.
There were casualties from organophosphate poisoning in both cases; that much is certain. But America has accused Assad of direct responsibility for Sarin attacks and even blamed Russia for culpability in the Khan Sheikhoun tragedy.
Now its own military boss has said on the record that we have no evidence to support this conclusion. In so doing, Mattis tacitly impugned the interventionists who were responsible for pushing the “Assad is guilty” narrative twice without sufficient supporting evidence, at least in the eyes of the Pentagon.
But this raises the question: Why did Mattis tell us a different story back in May of 2017?
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com