The gender identity superstition says that we choose apart from biology; and it is pushed in a “medical journal.”
Dr. Leena Nahata has turned her back on medical science and is pushing gender identity superstition in the magazine Pediatrics, a supposed medical journal. Basically, she wants parents to stop using sonograms to determine if they are going to have a boy or a girl, because gender is not determined by whether you are male or female.
The Federalist reports, “Pediatrician: Revealing Your Baby’s Sex Might Traumatize Him, Because Trans.”
The medical establishment is losing its bearings. Caught in the twilight zone of transgender alt-reality, where hurt feelings matter more than hard science, America’s pediatricians see a new threat on the horizon.
Nahata isn’t concerned about blurry sonograms that fail to capture anatomical details. She’s also not really talking about infants born with “atypical” genitals, requiring further tests to determine if the baby is a boy or a girl. (She acknowledges that those cases are so “rare” that they occur just once among “4500 to 5500 infants”—i.e., in about 0.02 percent of newborns.) No, Nahata wants parents to embrace a trans-friendly world premised on the idea that “[r]egardless of gender assignment at birth, some kids may later identify as the opposite gender.”
Only Your Baby Can Decide Reality
Note that Nahata sidesteps biological sex—a puzzling move for a doctor—and focuses on gender identity. A peek at a newborn’s genitals, by ultrasound or at birth, merely helps doctors “predict” a child’s future gender identity and “assign” the child a gender, Nahata says.
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com