Because, if taxes aren’t lowered for the top one percent along with everyone else, it is not a significant tax cut.
Championing the one percent isn’t a popular thing for a politician to do, but Rand Paul stuck to principle and sound economics instead of chickening out. It is a principle of equality that rich people don’t deserve to have their stuff stolen more than anyone else. It is an economic fact that the rich are more likely to invest in the economy with their money.
The real solution, if we are going to keep Federal income tax (we shouldn’t) is to have a low flat rate for everyone regardless of income level.
Lifezette reports on the Senator’s conversation with Laura Ingraham, “Rand Paul: Have to Cut Taxes on Top 1 Percent or It’s Not a ‘Significant Tax Cut.’”
Although Paul applauded some aspects of the bill’s content, he expressed disappointment, saying the proposed legislation as it now stands wouldn’t deliver the “significant tax cut” Trump and Republicans promised.
“If you don’t cut the top 1 percent, you don’t really have a significant tax cut,” Paul told LifeZette Editor-in-Chief Laura Ingraham. “What they’ve done is, they’ve bought into the class warfare on the individual side.”
“So at the top, there’s not going to be much of a tax cut. There will be some. And in the middle, there’s going to be a little bit — there’s mostly going to be eliminating deductions. And at the bottom, the bottom already don’t pay much income tax and will continue not to pay much income tax,” Paul added.
Here’s another good interview with Rand Paul on taxes (the tax discussion begins at 4:40):
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com