Using public information that we provide, a surveillance company has a growing business with police and other customers.
Babel Street is a surveillance company that depends on our willingness to use technology to track our activity and sell it to interested customers. Often those customers are government agencies. This is not necessarily a bad thing. If the police are trying to solve crimes, then they should use every legal means at their disposal. But at a time when CNN blackmailed a meme-creator they didn’t like, this story reminds us of how the government and corporations could abuse their power.
The Washington Post reports, “For this company, online surveillance leads to profit in Washington’s suburbs.”
The company’s Web crawlers, offered under a subscription called Babel X, trawl some 40 online sources, scooping up data from popular sites such as Instagram and a Korean social media platform as well as inside “dark Web” forums where cybercriminals lurk.
Police departments investigating a crime might use the service to scan posts linked to a certain neighborhood over a specified period of time. Stadium managers use it to hunt for security threats based on electronic chatter.
The Department of Homeland Security, county governments, law enforcement agencies and the FBI use it to keep tabs on dangerous individuals, even when they are communicating in one of more than 200 languages, including emoji.
The firm, staffed by former government intelligence veterans, is part of an insular but thriving cottage industry of data aggregators that operate outside of military and intelligence agencies. The 100-person company said it is profitable, something that is rare for a tech start-up in its third year. (It declined, though, to release financial details.) It recently took on $2.25 million from investors, bringing its total capital raised from investors to just over $5 million.
A U.S. subsidiary of the European software giant SAP is its largest institutional investor.
Businesses like Babel Street have to tread an ethical line to avoid igniting privacy concerns, even though the data they access is generally publicly available on the Internet. Groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) regard the industry’s growth as a worrying proliferation of online surveillance.
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com