There is going to be cultural Marxist engineering because cultural Marxism is a totalitarian project.
When political correctness has managed to chew up all the “soft sciences,” we shouldn’t be surprised to find moves toward culturally Marxist engineering as well. In the old Soviet Union, no field was exempt from having to integrate Marxist dogma. There is no “neutrality” and the confession that objective facts exist apart from the needs of class, race, or gender is offensive to the cultural Marxists.
Indrek Wichman writes for The James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal, “Engineering Education: Social Engineering Rather than Actual Engineering.”
The recently appointed dean of Purdue’s school, Dr. Donna Riley, has an ambitious agenda.
That starts off innocently enough, discussing the intersection of engineering with public policy and ethics, but then veers off the rails once Riley begins disparaging the free movement of capital, the role of Western civilization, and the nature of men, specifically “colonialist” white men. How can it improve the practice of engineering to bring in such diversions and distractions?
Riley’s purpose seems not to be how best to train new engineers but to let everyone know how bad engineers have been, how they continue to “oppress” women and persons of color, how much we need “diverse perspectives,” and how the “struggle” continues to level all distinctions and differences in society.
The editorial continues with more evidence that cultural Marxism is invading the discipline, not just at Purdue.
Here’s video from the Purdue Engineering YouTube channel:
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com