The “recovery” in Britain is another lesson that bailouts benefit the rich and leave the rest of us worse off.
The basic public premise of modern democracies is that bailouts benefit everyone. In America, politicians claim we must save Wall Street to save Main Street. Yet somehow, the “recovery” induced by bailouts leaves Wall Street better and main street worse off.
Britain pursued the same low interest rates that every other nation used to bail out their economies. What was the result? More of the income inequality that shifts the voters to favor Leftist policies!
The Guardian reports, “Top 1% of households in UK fully recovered from financial crisis.”
New research from the Resolution Foundation showed that households with incomes of £275,000 or more quickly recovered from the impact of the deep recession and have seen their share of national income return to the level seen before the global banking system froze up in the summer of 2007.
But while the rich have been thriving, the thinktank said the other 99% of UK households had found it more difficult to make ends meet.
It added that the year running up to last month’s general election had seen weaker wage growth, higher inflation and frozen welfare benefits and that these offset any gains from rising employment.
Groups that strongly supported Labour in the election – those aged under 35 who have been frozen out of home ownership by low wages and high prices – have fared particularly badly. They are the only group that had so far failed to see incomes return to pre-crisis levels.
The thinktank said the report highlighted a country increasingly divided by age, by housing tenure and by inequality – and that all three factors had been important in the shock election result in which Labour gained 30 seats and deprived the Conservatives of an overall majority.
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com