Are Republicans Backing Down from Lower Taxes?

In some states there is evidence of Republicans backing down from their promises because they won’t cut government.

In three states, we see the results of Republicans backing down from their core promise of cutting taxes. In Kansas, South Carolina, and Tennessee taxes are going up. And, of course, in Illinois we find Republicans backing down even though people are already fleeing the state taxes.

What is the problem?

The problem is that Republicans are practiced at promising to reduce taxes without promising with equal fervor to reduce spending.

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Eagle Rising updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The New York Times reports, “How Low Can Taxes Go? Outside Washington, Republicans Find Limits.

It ends with this surprisingly accurate appraisal of tax reform at the Federal level.

Many conservatives who support a tax overhaul said they anticipated considerable growth with a reduction in corporate rates, which are among the highest in the world. If those are lowered to 15 percent, down from the current 35 percent, businesses will not only reinvest in the United States but relocate here, they said.

“At 15 percent, Swiss bankers will move here,” said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform.

But restraining federal spending is still going to be a key part of the equation. “What you need is not an explosion of spending,” Mr. Norquist added. “And you need the economy to grow faster than the size of the government.”

In a world in which Mr. Trump’s “deconstruction of the administrative state” reduces the size and cost of the government, the tax cuts make sense. But if lawmakers do not have the nerve to find savings somewhere, like in the social safety net for retirees, the outcome could end up resembling something close to Kansas’ failed experiment.

“The question is whether you can put together some kind of revenue-neutral tax reform,” said N. Gregory Mankiw, a professor of economics at Harvard and chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under President George W. Bush. “I don’t see the political will to do that right now. Certainly not in this environment.”

Read the entire New York Times story.

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com


About the author

Joe Scudder

Joe Scudder

Joe Scudder is the "nom de plume" (or "nom de guerre") of a fifty-ish-year-old writer and stroke survivor. He lives in St Louis with his wife and still-at-home children. He has been a freelance writer and occasional political activist since the early nineties. He describes his politics as Tolkienesque.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Send this to a friend