This does not surprise me in the tiniest element. A new study just came out showing that the selection of 2008, Obama’s “shining moment”, may have actually been decided by illegal votes.
We already know that it is possible for illegal immigrants to vote in our elections. Just look back at all the votes for Hillary Clinton in this last election that were deemed either illegal, or the stolen identity of a dead person.
That would also explain Obummer’s uncanny support for illegal immigration into our country.
Federalist Papers reports that a new study is claiming that almost 6 million “non-citizens” may have voted in the election of 2008.
The conservative think-tank Just Facts told The Washington Times that they took a second look at the post-election polling for the election that gave us President Barack Obama. With fresh eyes, they have concluded that far more illegal ballots were cast than originally believed.
The group’s president, James D. Agresti, said he and his team looked at data from an extensive poll done every two years that has a sample size of tens of thousands of voters. Some of them admit they are non-citizens and therefore ineligible to vote.
He estimated that as many as 7.9 million noncitizens were illegally registered that year and 594,000 to 5.7 million voted.
These numbers are more in line with the unverified estimates given by President Trump, who said the number of ballots cast by noncitizens was the reason he lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton.
Last month, the president signed an executive order setting up a commission to try to find on-the-ground truth in illegal voting. Headed by Vice President Mike Pence, the panel also will look at outdated voter lists across the nation with names of dead people and multiple registrants.
For 2012, Just Facts said, 3.2 million to 5.6 million noncitizens were registered to vote and 1.2 million to 3.6 million of them voted.
Agresti defended his calculations to the paper, saying he compared census bureau data with his own information. In addition, noncitizens overwhelmingly vote Democratic.
“The details are technical, but the figure I calculated is based on a more conservative margin of sampling error and a methodology that I consider to be more accurate,” Mr. Agresti told The Washington Times.
So while CNN is too busy with their nose up the crack of a non-existant Russian collusion, they are letting information like this fall through….or perhaps burying it as quickly as they can!
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com