Why the Browsing History Bill is Worse than Other Anti-Privacy Acts

Donald Trump signed a bill that allows internet service providers (ISPs) to sell customers’ private browsing history—an unexpected blow to privacy rights and internet security. While most of Donald Trump’s actions with respect to national security (such as building a wall, limiting immigration from terrorist havens, deporting gang members, etc.), whether one supports them or not, provide clear ends to increase security, this move to allow the circulation of individuals’ private internet browsing data is a detriment to both privacy and security, including the collective security of the public. The only benefit is the revenue stream it provides to ISPs and, cause for great concern, the information it provides to the unknown benefactors of the data.

We’ve known for a long time that our data is vulnerable, so why is this worse than other actions the government and corporations have taken in recent decades to erode privacy?

Internet browsing history, in many ways, is the pinnacle of private data for people who use the internet frequently. Many people use the internet for banking, shopping, communicating intimately with others, and a host of other private activities. The internet is increasingly becoming the primary source of all sorts of information for more; this is like libraries selling a log of the books people check out—and so much more.

This highlights the importance of remaining vocal, critical, and objective—especially if you support President Trump.

take our poll - story continues below

Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?

  • Should President Trump declare a national emergency to build the wall?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Eagle Rising updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Muslim Religious Leader says “Muslims have the Right to Kill anyone who does Not Respect Islam”

Partisan politics and political loyalties must not impede our ability to move issues in the proper direction, especially concerning our Constitutional rights (including privacy) and national security. In recent days, alternative media giant Alex Jones has downplayed the significance of this move. Having won the election, it is critical that we do not delegate our civic responsibility to the Executive Branch for the next four years; elected officials work for the people, and the people must perpetually make their directives known.

Reposted With Permission From TopsThought.space

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com

About the author


About the author: Born in 1989 and raised in the Midwest with frequent trips to rural Kentucky, my political leanings have tended toward the right for most of my life; and expressing my strong views through writing has always been my greatest skill.

My beliefs in free speech, Lockean principles of private property, nationalism, the United States Constitution, and the free market, have survived a liberal arts education at a private college run mostly by leftists—what an experience that was!

In many ways, that was the crucible for my conservatism, rendering it even more solid. Moving out to the Left Coast at the beginning of our last election finished the job. While I have much to say about these experiences, my articles will focus mainly on the current news as it happens.

For more of my thoughts, visit www.topsthought.space

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Send this to a friend