“The Russians are coming! The Russians are coming!” —Luther Grilk, in the titular line from the famous film by Norman Jewison
“The lady doth protest too much, me thinks.” —Queen Gertrude, Hamlet’s mother, from the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare
Once upon a time, there were corrupt media outlets that attempted to manipulate the American people by agreeing to report fake news stories, using the same talking points, to make the stories seem true. However, upon being repeatedly proven false in their reporting, people stopped listening to their pronouncements and warnings. And so it was the citizenry became aware of “Cry-Wolf Journalism.”
Obama, a Patsy for Putin
With regard to making arrangements disadvantageous to America’s missile defense—arrangements which would please Vladimir Putin—President Obama was famously caught, in Seoul, Korea, talking about such plans on a hot microphone, unaware the mike was still on. “This is my last election. . . . After my election I have more flexibility,” Obama said, to which Dmitry Medvedev, Vladimir Putin’s protégé, replied, “I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”
Clinton, Also a Patsy
The New York Times has reported that, according to what Pravda has called “President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was instrumental in facilitating “the deal [that] made [Russian-owned] Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers. . . . But the untold story . . . is one that involves . . . [how Hillary Clinton] gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by . . . Clinton. . . . As the Russians . . . assumed control of Uranium One . . . a flow of [$2.35 million in] cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. . . . And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank. . . .”
It would seem the Russians would stand to benefit from a Clinton presidency and, therefore, would choose to help Clinton’s campaign—rather than Trump’s—if Russia were to interfere with America’s electoral process. The Russians persuaded Clinton to hand over one-fifth of America’s uranium, thereby failing to put her own country’s interests first; indeed, Clinton has put Russia first, while Trump has stated that he will put America first. So, how does it benefit Russia to help Trump, instead of the candidate who puts America last?
Obama Claims Election-Tampering Is Not Possible
Before America voted on November 8th, Obama called Trump crazy for thinking that election-tampering was possible. Obama said anyone who believed a presidential election could be rigged did not “have what it takes to be in this job [the presidency].” He also said “there is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America’s elections.” The purpose of these comments was to smear Donald Trump, who had legitimate concerns about Democrat vote tampering—which ultimately proved to be well-founded, when, during the Wisconsin and Michigan recounts, widespread Democrat voter fraud was discovered in Milwaukee and Detroit. It also appeared that the state of Nevada may have been stolen by the Clinton campaign, due to massive voter fraud. Other states where there were indicators of massive election fraud were Virginia, New Hampshire, and California.
Hillary’s Inflated Popular Vote
Even if the only state stolen was Nevada—a state whose Electoral Votes fail to add up to a big enough number to steal the White House from Trump—the number of fraudulent votes cast for Hillary nationwide may easily surpass the 2.8 million popular votes by which she allegedly won the popular vote. In fact, if California’s votes—for both Clinton and Trump—were removed from the national election, Trump would have won the popular vote total by 1.4 million votes! This is one of the reasons each state holds its own separate presidential election within an Electoral College system that disallows one state’s fraud from corrupting the election by tipping the national vote total all by itself. The Electoral College safeguards our free republic by valuing freedom as a higher value than pure democracy.
What Real Election Tampering Looks Like: Obama Tells Illegals to Vote
In an interview well-publicized on the Internet, President Obama encouraged illegal aliens to vote. This is verifiable election-tampering, committed openly by a president so sure that Hillary Clinton would win that he threw caution to the wind. It is also widely anticipated that Obama will pardon himself before he leaves office “for all crimes Barack Obama may have committed.” Of course, election tampering is nothing new to Obama; according to Israeli Knesset candidate Caroline Glick, in 2015, Obama sent “his 2012 field campaign manager to Israel to run a campaign to defeat Netanyahu.”
Assange: Russia Did Not Hack for Wikileaks
So, besides the fact that there is no real benefit for Russia in helping Trump—since Putin would lose a useful patsy in Clinton—coupled with the fact that there is strong evidence indicating widespread Democrat voter fraud, the man who would know exactly where Wikileaks obtained its information has come forward to confirm it was not Russia or any nation-state that gave John Podesta’s emails to Wikileaks; that man is Julian Assange, an Australian national currently living in the Ecuadoran embassy in London, to avoid extradition to Sweden on trumped-up charges of sexual assault.
Obama’s Politicized FBI and CIA Join the Fray
Obama’s politicized FBI is the selfsame Bureau that allowed a Muslim Jihadist to travel from Alaska to Florida, to murder and wound innocent civilians. And Obama’s CIA is headed by a Muslim convert. These government departments are, therefore, not going to say or do anything to help Donald Trump, the only candidate—Democrat or Republican—who has spoken out about Islam’s jihadist ideology.
Refusing to Share Intelligence
In mid-December of 2016, the FBI, CIA, and National Intelligence directors refused, when asked, to brief the House Intelligence Committee on the alleged Russian cyber-attacks that supposedly occurred during the presidential campaign. This would indicate that any evidence presented later would likely prove illegitimate, because, unless time were needed to manufacture false documentation, why would proof of Russian hacking not be presentable right away?
Leaking Fake News
In early January, Trump complained that a classified intelligence report was leaked to NBC ahead of being shared with him. This calls the legitimacy of the information into question. Otherwise, why would Democrat intelligence officials choose to leak the information to their propaganda arm (NBC is renowned for its Democrat propaganda) before sharing it with the president-elect? If the information were genuine, government officials would take great care not to leak it. This leak likely occurred with an eye to allowing NBC to create a propaganda narrative damaging to Trump.
CNN’s Jake Tapper Signals Buzzfeed to Attack Trump with Lies
Last week, there was a coordinated effort between CNN and Buzzfeed to attack President-Elect Trump with fake news. Of course, fewer people will read the retraction than the original smear. So, CNN’s Jake Tapper hints at the existence of evidence that Russia has secret blackmail about Trump, but will not give details. Then Buzzfeed, taking its cue from Tapper, releases a 35-page document, although a statement is issued that it is unverified information—aka fake news.
Trump was blunt about the misinformation assault against him with CNN’s Jim Acosta during a press conference, on January 11th, when he said CNN was a “terrible organization” and “fake news” before taking questions. “I think it was disgraceful, disgraceful that the intelligence agencies allowed any information that turned out to be so false and fake out. I think it’s a disgrace,” said Trump.
Since genuine threats to national security are generally not so carelessly leaked, James Clapper called Trump with an apology. But much more is owed Trump than an apology from Clapper.
Barack Obama, the Boy Who Cries Wolf
Barack Obama, the leader-in-chief of the illegitimacy campaign against Trump’s embryonic presidency, owes Trump a huge apology. Trump will, however, never receive that apology, because Barack Obama is not sorry. He is an inveterate political operative who will say or do anything to further the agenda of George Soros, his puppet master. Obama will continue to cry wolf until his last minute in office, hoping that the American public is just childish enough to believe the little boy who cries wolf just one more time. . . .
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com