TSA to Run Security at Bus Stops and Train Stations

The TSA’s so effective at preventing terrorists from boarding planes that we should employ them to run “security” in other transportation venues like buses and trains – at least according to a new bipartisan piece of legislation in the Senate that’s been drawn up in response to the recent bombings in New York and New Jersey. From Bloomberg:

Several U.S. senators want the TSA to focus more attention and resources on rail, highway, and marine transportation, which would mean greater security oversight at such places as Amtrak stations and Megabus coach stops. A bipartisan bill introduced Thursday by Senator John Thune (R-S.D.) would require the TSA to use a risk-based security model for these transport modes and to budget money based on those risks. It would require a wider use of the agency’s terrorist watch list by train operators and more detailed passenger manifests along with tighter screening of marine employees. The legislation also would increase the TSA’s canine use by as many as 70 dog-handler teams for surface transportation.

Of course, what I’m envisioning are the same blue-shirted, latex-gloved agents with the body scanners and pat downs we see – and feel – at airports. But sponsors are promising that that’s not what they have in mind. “This is very much not creating for bus or rail transportation the [security] model that exists for aviation,” as one committee spokesman ensured.

take our poll - story continues below

What is your top alternative to Facebook? - FIXED

  • What is your top alternative to Facebook?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Eagle Rising updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Wisconsin Glassware Company Hands Out Guns to Employees for Christmas

According to a public statement by Senator Thune, the bill “addresses gaps in TSA’s approach to assessing security risks and will help the agency better fulfill its role as a hub of analysis, planning, and information.” 

As to why Congress and the Senate would ever think that delegating more responsibilities to a disaster of an agency, that’s par for the course. The TSA doesn’t need more responsibilities. It doesn’t need to budget its money better. It doesn’t need more money or personnel. It just needs to not exist.

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com


About the author

Philip Hodges

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Send this to a friend