Scientific Consensus: MAJORITY of Doctors Surveyed Say This About Hillary’s Health

Liberals always bring up the alleged “97%” of scientists who believe that man is behind catastrophic global warming. Never mind the fact that the 97% represented just 75 scientists out of a total of 79.

All because of that bogus survey, liberals have shut down debate on the issue. Science is always supposed to be up for debate. But manmade global warming has gotten so political that they desperately need to silence any opposition.

What will liberals say now that a majority of doctors surveyed say that Hillary Clinton’s health concerns are so serious that she could be disqualified from the office of Presidency?

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Eagle Rising updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Concerns about Hillary Clinton’s health are “serious—could be disqualifying for the position of President of the U.S.,” say nearly 71% of 250 physicians responding to an informal internet survey by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS). About 20% said concerns were “likely overblown, but should be addressed as by full release of medical records.” Only 2.7% responded that they were “just a political attack; I have confidence in the letter from her physician and see no cause for concern.”

While more than 81% were aware of her history of a concussion, only 59% were aware of the cerebral sinus thrombosis, and 52% of the history of deep venous thrombosis.

More than 78% said the health concerns had received “not enough emphasis” in the media, and only 2.7% that there had been “too much emphasis.”

Nearly two-thirds said that a physician who had a concern about a candidate’s fitness to serve for health reasons should “make the concerns known to the public.” Only 11% said a physician should “keep silent unless he had personally examined the patient,” and 10% that the candidate’s health was “off limits for public discussion.”

Let me guess. Liberals are going to say that the issue has gotten way too political. After all, these must have been mostly partisan doctors who were obviously being paid off by the vast alt-right conspiracy.

According to The Hill, the Clinton campaign and the media are doubling down, trying to silence anyone who criticizes Hillary’s health, just as liberals have done with global warming.

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com


About the author

Philip Hodges

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Send this to a friend