Judge Throws Out This RIDICULOUS Lawsuit Against Starbucks

From the Daily Caller News Foundation:

A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit against Starbucks alleging the company defrauds its costumers by under-filling drinks.

The plaintiff, Alexander Forouzesh, brought the claim against the coffeehouse claiming they defraud customers “by advertising its cold drinks as containing more liquid than they do by ‘underfilling’ its cups with liquid and then adding ice to make the cups appear full.” Plaintiff alleged that the underfilling is so pronounced that a 16 liquid ounce “grande” drink will have only 12 liquid ounces of coffee. Forouzesh claimed the underfilling practice constituted breach of warranty and unjust enrichment.

In this case the court would have to determine whether the law’s archetypal “reasonable person” would be misled by the companies labeling practices.

take our poll - story continues below

Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?

  • Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Eagle Rising updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Disgusting: Liberals Rejoice That Actor Gerard Butler Lost His Home in Calif. Wildfires Because He Supports Israel

U.S. District Court Judge Percy Anderson quickly dismissed the case, expressing little patience for Forouzesh’s arguments. In dismissing the case, Anderson wrote that no child could possibly be misled by Starbucks’s advertising practices, much less its adult consumers.

“If children have figured out that including ice in a cold beverage decreases the amount of liquid they will receive, the Court has no difficulty concluding that a reasonable consumer would not be deceived into thinking that when they order an iced tea, that the drink they receive will include both ice and tea and that for a given size cup, some portion of the drink will be ice rather than whatever liquid beverage the consumer ordered,” Anderson wrote.

“It’s disappointing to see that the judge didn’t recognize the viability of the claims and the merits of the case,” Justin Farahi who represented Forouzesh, told Jacob Gershman of the Wall Street Journal.

A similar suit against Illinois is currently underway in Illinois.

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com


About the author

eaglerising

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Send this to a friend