Senator Rand Paul Fighting for Liberty

Senator Rand Paul appeared on Fox News Sunday Morning with Chris Wallace to discuss a few issues that have recently cropped up, but one in particular caught our attention here at Eagle Rising. It has to do with Senator Paul’s continued fight against the overreaching powers of the federal government and particularly the NSA. He always seems to be trying to remind us that our freedom is worth fighting for!

And it’s a pain. But it’s a pain because we’re trying to protect people’s freedom. We’re trying to protect the Bill of Rights.

That’s what we’re fighting against terrorism to protect. So, we can’t give up the Bill of Rights in order to try to fight terrorism. You have to keep your privacy. You have to keep the Bill of Rights.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Eagle Rising updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The part we’re focusing in on starts at about 7:25 into the video. (But the whole thing is pretty good and worth watching.)

 

WALLACE: We also learned this week, another revelation from Edward Snowden, that the NSA collects records on cell phones, 4 billion cell phone records outside the country every day. And that they can also track where those cell phones are so they can track where people are.

Big picture: how severely would you like to restrict the surveillance by the National Security Agency?

RandPaulFightPAUL: I would like to apply the Fourth Amendment to third-party records. I don’t think you give up your privacy when someone else holds your records. So, when I have a contract with a phone company, I think those are still my records. And you can look at them if you’re from the government if you ask a judge.

But the most important thing is, a warrant applies to one person. A warrant doesn’t apply to everyone in America. So, it’s absolutely against the spirit and the letter of the Fourth Amendment to say that a judge can write one warrant and you can get every phone call in America. That’s what’s happening.

I think it’s wrong. It goes against everything America stands for.

And I will help to fight that all the way to the Supreme Court. And we need the Supreme Court to re-examine privacy, the Fourth Amendment and our records.

WALLACE: So, you would ban, if you could, mass data mining — this kind of huge vacuum hovering up of information?

PAUL: I’m for going after terrorists with every tool we have. I’m not opposed to the NSA. I’m not opposed to spying. But I am in favor of the Fourth Amendment.

So, if we think someone’s a terrorist, you call a judge. You get a warrant. If that person’s called 100 people, you get 100 more warrants. If they’ve called 10,000 people, you got to get 10,000 individual warrants.

And it’s a pain. But it’s a pain because we’re trying to protect people’s freedom. We’re trying to protect the Bill of Rights.

That’s what we’re fighting against terrorism to protect. So, we can’t give up the Bill of Rights in order to try to fight terrorism. You have to keep your privacy. You have to keep the Bill of Rights.

Keep preaching the truth, Senator Paul. Hopefully we’ll begin to win more and more converts to the idea that liberty is more important than perceived safety. The government shouldn’t be allowed to vacuum up the data of innocent American citizens in some nebulous fight against terror.

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com


About the author

eaglerising

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Send this to a friend