Here’s the disturbing truth that the Left either chooses not to admit or just can’t believe themselves. The liberal “gay equality” movement has always been about so much more than ensuring that American homosexuals are treated the same as American heterosexuals. If it were just about that, then their lobbying would have stopped some time ago – because homosexuals have reached a stage in American history where they have become a protected class, with more “rights” and privileges than your average American. The culture has swung so far in their favor that it is laughable to suggest that American homosexuals still suffer any maltreatment from the state. In fact, if they are disturbed by your average private citizen, they are likely to find the state as a willing ally in persecuting the politically incorrect citizen!
They “gay rights” movement has always been about far more than “equality.” It’s about power and destruction. Power for the liberal, big-government ideologues and the destruction of traditional, mainly conservative, Christian culture.
The wonderful folks at the Sydney Traditionalist Forum (or SydneyTrads) recently collected a selection of quotes from gay leaders proving this point. In particular, the quotes show that for many gay leaders, the fight for “gay rights” means the forced acceptance of pedophilia as normal.
Read the proof for yourself.
“I think it is courageous […] Offering a rational, informed perspective on sexual relations between younger and older people, they document examples of societies where consenting inter-generational sex is considered normal, beneficial and enjoyable by old and young alike. […] The positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not confined to non-Western cultures. Several of my friends, gay and straight, male and female had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13. All say it was their conscious choice and gave them great joy […] it is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted, abusive or harmful.”
“I also have a friend, a paedophile, who is working very hard on making sense out of his relations with boys. These relations consist of, among other things, a large amount of nurture and support for these boys, a real caring for their welfare and growth. […] So what is the problem? Or more succinctly, what is the problem we are facing that warrants the construction of an issue about the relations between gay men and kids? […] For, anecdotes aside, one thing should be quite clear: gay men do have a wide range of relationships with kids, their own, their friends’, in ‘families’ and other social arrangements. That is the starting point in the debate, and it is from this point, our practices, that a political position can be built. And a new political position is needed for there are significant political struggles at stake. First, we have three legal/social questions to win: custody right for gay men and lesbians; the legal rights of paedophiles and their young lovers; and finally the sexual rights of children as a whole. Second, we have three issues within the homosexual movement and community: the support gay men provide the women’s movement and in our alternative child rearing practices and arrangements; the way we have set up the debate at present; and last the real meaning of childlessness. […]
“Cuddling, breastfeeding, bathing together, playing, kissing and fondling kids are immensely pleasurable activities for them and for us. And it is not uncommon to be sexually aroused by that closeness, that touch and that love. How different then is that gentle, tentative sexuality between parent and child from the love of a paedophile and his/her lover? […] The current paedophilia debate then is crucial to the political process of the gay movement: paedophiles need our support, and we need to construct the child/adult sex issue on our terms. […] Our new kinds of arrangements collectively create a new politics of child/adult relations. Is this a bit of gay chauvinism, gay pride, a fond idealistic hope? Maybe, but since when have we too regarded pride as a sin?”
“Because if the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what thirteen-, fourteen-, and fifteen-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world.”
Journalist Ginger Gorman who interviewed Gay “Dads” and was then “shocked” to Learn that the men were actually depraved Pedophiles:
“I was putting together a series of interviews on gender. This particular interview was with a couple who were gay dads, and they had been on a long journey to have a child via surrogacy […] I felt no sense that anything was wrong. For all intents and purposes this appeared to be a loving family and a loving household. And I’ve gone over and over it in my brain and I just did not feel that anything was wrong[…] I’m profoundly shocked and disgusted by what’s happened. Since then I am just revolted and I find myself quite despairing about the turn of events.”
Eve Ensler, Author of the Vagina Monologues and defender of lesbian rape:
“Now people say that it was kind of rape. I was only thirteen and she was twenty-four. Well, I say, if it was a rape, it was a good rape then, a rape that turned my sorry-ass coochi-snorcher into a kind of heaven.”
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com