University Student Government Demands Staff Paycuts to Fund Student Abortions!

Campus Reform
Written by Campus Reform

Student senators at the notoriously progressive UC Berkeley have recently passed a bill that would bring abortion providers to campus clinics. Senators have declared abortions are “necessary and relevant in student life,” and the sponsors of the bill want administrators to take a pay cut to fund the procedures.

Aanchal Chugh, primary sponsor of Senate Resolution 69 (and yes, that’s really its number), told Campus Reform that “[t]he resolution does not expect students to pay for these services as I, and those who voted for it, believe that health is a right not a privilege.” 

If you want to find out more, you can read the story below:

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Eagle Rising updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The University of California in Berkeley (UCB) could provide on-campus access to abortions if a student senate bill successfully sways the administration.

Senate Resolution 69 (SR 69), a bill that would bring abortion providers to campus clinics, passed a final round of voting Wednesday during a weekly student senate meeting.

The bill argues that inaccessibility to abortion is a violation of women’s rights and impedes academic progress. Since, the bill suggests, women make up a majority of the undergraduate student population, it is only just they be provided with any means necessary to eradicate whatever may get in the way of academic success.

“When medication abortion is not available at UHS (University Health Services), students who are seeking an abortion face financial, time, and travel constraint burdens that create negative impacts on academic performance and mental health,” the bill states. “UHS is a health center dedicated to meeting the health needs of students in order for students to be able to upkeep their academic well-being. Abortion is a common health-care service and access to abortion is necessary and relevant in student life.”

UCBerkeleyCampusThe bill employs several statistics to reinforce its logic, including things like: women aged 18-24 account for 44 percent of all abortions in the United States, one in four women will have an abortion by age 30, and women make up 52 percent of UCB’s undergraduate population.

The argument, it seems, is that college-aged women, especially if they have a dominant presence on campus, deserve easy access to abortion since they are the demographic that is statistically most probable to need one in the first place.

The bill also notes that abortion services were available on campus in the 1980’s but have since been abolished because of a lack of trained abortion providers. Now, however, the bill states that there are many trained professionals working in the school’s health office who could very well provide students with abortions.

“Currently, Tang [Center, the school’s clinic] does have staff trained/skilled abortion providers and is able to provide medication abortion,” the bill states.

The bill neglects to explain where funding for on-campus abortions would come from. Since UCB is a public school, though, taxpayer dollars would likely help provide students with access to abortions.

Aanchal Chugh, primary sponsor of the bill, told Campus Reform she thinks funds for abortions should be taken from administrator’s paychecks.

“I believe the University should reorganize funds from the administration’s paychecks to university health services. Many of the administrators at UC Berkeley receive more than generous paychecks while they continue to put student health on the backburner,” Chugh said. “This resolution is demanding that the university reconsider and reprioritize its funding. Instead of investing money into the administration’s paychecks, the university should be investing in students’ health and safety needs.”

Campus Reform reached out to Chancellor Nicholas Dirks and Provost Claude Steele to see if either would be willing to take a pay cut in order to fund abortions but neither replied in time for publication. This story will be updated if a response is received.

Whether administrators are willing to take a pay cut or not, Chugh says she does not think students should have to contribute funds for these on-campus abortions in any way.

“The resolution does not expect students to pay for these services as I, and those who voted for it, believe that health is a right not a privilege,” she added. “The university should be providing this right to all students.”



Reposted with Permission from Campus Reform.

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

About the author

Campus Reform

Campus Reform

Campus Reform, a project of the Leadership Institute, is America's leading site for college news.
As a watchdog to the nation's higher education system, Campus Reform exposes bias and abuse on the nation's college campuses.
Our team of professional journalists works alongside student activists and student journalists to report on the conduct and misconduct of university administrators, faculty, and students.
Campus Reform holds itself to rigorous journalism standards and strives to present each story with accuracy, objectivity, and public accountability.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Send this to a friend