McCain Wants More War in Syria

To call Senator John McCain a “war hawk” is kind of like saying President Obama is liberal… it’s an understatement of ridiculous proportions. There has not been a military engagement since he’s taken office as a Congressman in 1982 that McCain has been against. The current conflict in Syria is no different.

Senator McCain was on CNN recently calling for the transfer of heavy weapons to the Syrian opposition. This comes only days after the President’s announcement that we would be getting personally involved in the conflict by supplying “light” guns and ammunition to the rebels fighting the government of Bashar Assad.

The President’s announcement came on the heels of our government’s statement that Syria had crossed a “red line” and used chemical weapons to kill between 100 and 150 of their own citizens. Chemical weapons are of course monstrous, but some 93,000 Syrians have been killed by government forces since the Civil War started. It leaves one to wonder: do the Syrian people care about how they are murdered or just that they are murdered? This question of semantics isn’t really what I care about here, but my question has more to do with why.

Why is Syria different than the Sudan? What makes this situation so important that we need to become involved? Horrible things happen all over the world every day–wars, famine, pestilence, disease. We do not personally involve ourselves in every one because we don’t have the resources to help everyone. So why should the Syrian rebels gain precedence over Christians in South Sudan who have no way to protect themselves?

The rebels in Syria are extremist Sunni militia, some of whom are loyal to Al-Qaeda. In fact, some of the rebel military units are Al-Qaeda! While Bashar Assad is an evil monster, I would contend that both sides of this fight are quite evil. There are better battles to involve ourselves in.

John-MccainWe also don’t have the resources to win in Syria. McCain is wrong about entering this fight, but he is right about the fact that the support we plan to give will be meaningless in this fight. Hezbollah entered the fray weeks ago and as soon as our government announced its involvement we learned that Iran would begin providing support for the Syrian government as well. Lebanon and Syria are providing man power, heavy weapons, and financial support. They are in this fight to win because they understand the importance of propping up the Shia friendly Assad regime in the midst of many nations that are predominantly Sunni.

By involving ourselves, all we are doing is once again alienating about 200 million world Shia. In a fight between two bad guys who both hate us, wouldn’t it be better to not get involved at all? Perhaps to simply say we stand ready to offer humanitarian aid if requested? There is a better answer for the United States in Syria, and that is to do nothing.

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

About the author

Onan Coca

Onan is the Editor-in-Chief at Romulus Marketing and Bravera Holdings. He's also the managing editor at,, and the managing partner at You can read more of his writing at Eagle Rising.
Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in Atlanta with his wife and their five wonderful children.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Don't Miss Out!!

Get your daily dose of Eagle Rising by entering your email address below.

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×
Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become an insider.

Send this to a friend