Liberals Flip when Scientific Report Concludes that Human Biology Proves “Intelligent Design”!

&nbsp

Facts and logic are stubborn things. Those of us who are critical of the claim that nothing become something, and that something somehow organized itself into living organisms, and then gradually evolved over millions of years into what you and I see in the mirror each morning have always known that such a hypothesis is riddled with holes.

Biochemist Michael Behe’s book Darwin’s Black Box defended the premise “that some biochemical structures are too complex to be explained by known evolutionary mechanisms and are therefore probably the result of intelligent design.”

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Eagle Rising updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The book and the Intelligent Design (ID) movement was viciously attacked but never refuted.

Now there’s a scientific paper that has gotten evolutionists even more upset than the ID movement. Instead of ID’s undefined “intelligence” being behind the function of cell structure and operation, the paper posits a Creator:

“A recent scientific paper on the movement of the human hand has faced strong criticism for referring to a ‘Creator’ throughout.

“The paper, titled: ‘Biomechanical characteristics of hand coordination in grasping activities of daily living’ was written by a team of four researchers, three from Huazhong University in China, and one from Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts.”

Evolutionists are apoplectic over the claims of a Creator in the article. They want the article suppressed. Because of all the pressure, the article was retracted. This is so-called science at work. Here are some of the tweets from scientists who opposed any consideration of a Creator:

creation FB

They will go back to their labs and computers – all created by intelligent beings – and breathe a sigh of relief that have not been found out.

There is not a single example in the life of a scientist where anything they work with came into existence out of nothing or gradually evolved over time. The gradual evolution of the hand (or anything else) over time does not fit with what we all experience in the real world.

Where did the organic material that makes up the hand come from? There isn’t a scientist in the world who knows given the operating principles of science, logic, and biology. Where did the organized information come from that makes the movement of the hand and every other part of the human body work? Again, evolutionists don’t know and can’t offer a scientific alternative to a Creator.

There is a revolution going on with robotics, self-driving cars, and artificial intelligence. And who’s behind all of it? Intelligent creators who built the robots and programmed them.

Could this created mechanical hand, modeled after the divinely created human hand, ever have evolved in a robotic’s lab even if every part was available for it to self-organize?

Evolutionists want us to believe that while they are creators and programmers of robots that work like them, they deny that they were created and designed. It makes absolutely no sense.

Reposted with permission from Constitution.com

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com


About the author

Gary DeMar

Gary DeMar

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Send this to a friend