Cyber Expert: Hillary Clinton Exposed Classified Information and Yes, It is Illegal

Tim Brown
Written by Tim Brown

And yet, Hillary Rodham Clinton is not only free, but she is running for the Oval Office! This week, House Committee on Science, Space and Technology Chairman Lamar Smith questioned Telos Corporation CEO and Chairman John Wood whether or not his company would engage in the kind of activity that the former Secretary of State did concerning her personal email server. “That would be imprudent and would also be illegal,” said Wood.

“Let’s say a senior government official at an execute branch department approached your company to set up a private email server for conducting official and personal business,” Smith began a hypothetical, yet real, scenario. “These emails could include sensitive or classified information about national security. In addition, emails could be stored on a private server stored in their private residence.”

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Eagle Rising updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Cyber attacks and obvious intrusions would be obvious threats among other security risks,” he added. “The material being transmitted from a private email account could be a matter of national security.”

Wood then followed up with two questions:

  1. Could this scenario expose classified information to being hacked?
  2. How would your company respond to such a request?

To the first question, Wood answered an unequivocal “Yes.”

On the second question, Wood elaborated, “We wouldn’t do it. You are exposing classified data in the open. At the end of the day, that would be imprudent and would also be illegal.”

When asked why it would be illegal by Smith, Wood answered, “The government requirement is that all official information be used through official means, meaning government networks.”

So, the obvious question, on top of a plethora of testimony and documentation is why has there been no indictment of Hillary Clinton? Why has there been absolutely no move on the part of this committee nor the Benghazi committee, led by Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) to indict this woman parading herself around as a viable candidate for the office of the presidency?

My guess is that it is a demonstration of just how far the corruption has run, and yes, like it or not that corruption has spread into even Republican favorites who somehow say the right things, but fail to bring the resolve of justice.

I truly wish there was someone in office, any one, who would step forward and begin the process to bring Mrs. Clinton, as well as the usurper-in-chief, to justice!


from Freedom Outpost

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

About the author

Tim Brown

Tim Brown

Tim Brown is an author and Editor at, husband to his wife, father of 10, jack of all trades, Christian and lover of liberty. He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina. Tim is also an affiliate for the brand new Joshua Mark 5 AR/AK hybrid semi-automatic rifle.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Send this to a friend