Senator Mike Lee to Introduce Legislation to Protect Religious Organizations

In recent years, committed religious Americans and the organizations they support have come under withering fire from the liberal social issues crusade. Whether it’s from the LGBT fascists who would kill any dissent to their worldview and “morality,” or it’s from progressive organizations like the SPLC or the ACLU seeking to shut conservatives and religious people out of the national conversation. Conservative religious folk have come under extreme pressure for their no longer mainstream beliefs.

While the attacks on individual citizens have become common knowledge among conservatives, it’s the attacks on religious organizations that may actually be the more dangerous and immediate threat. While individuals can still argue that their First Amendment rights are being trampled and the average American citizen (and perhaps even court) will support them… organizations are at a disadvantage because they are not recognized as “people.”

So “Christian” universities, schools, hospitals and businesses have a far more difficult time standing against the crushing blows from the left.

take our poll - story continues below

What is your top alternative to Facebook? - FIXED

  • What is your top alternative to Facebook?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Eagle Rising updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Bad Hombres Apprehended Near Texas Border… Sex Offenders, Gang Members

 

 

(We haven’t even mentioned Hobby Lobby and the dozens of other businesses who fought against Obamacare based on the religious convictions of their owners and operators.)

religious freedomThankfully, there is someone in Washington, D.C. who is thinking of new ways to protect our religious organizations against these attacks.

Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) on Wednesday was speaking to leaders from various Christian colleges when he announced that he would soon be introducing legislation to protect their schools (and other religious organizations) from being discriminated against by the federal government because of their support for traditional marriage.

 

Wednesday’s announcement was framed as a direct reaction to the issue of tax-exemption and religious belief raised before the Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges, the same-sex marriage case that will likely be decided this month.

During oral argument of that case, U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli indicated religious schools failing to accept same-sex marriage could lose their tax-exempt status were same-sex marriage recognized as a constitutional right.

 

Senator Lee was not happy (and no one else should be either) with the comments from Verrilli, and this legislation responds to the fears that the government may follow through with Verrilli’s threats.

 

“The response uttered by Gen. Verrilli was troubling, to say the very least… The government ought to not only promise that it is not going to force any church to perform a same-sex marriage against its own teachings, but we ought to have a guarantee by the government to the American people … that the government won’t penalize any religious institution or any religious individual —based on a religious belief — that that individual or that institution believes that marriage is an institution between a man and a woman. That’s why I wrote this legislation…

We need this legislation. We need to draw lines around the power of government, lines that are there to protect the people from the overpowering influence of government, an overpowering influence that can, from time-to-time, trample on religious freedom.

 

Amen, Senator Lee. Amen.

 

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com


About the author

eaglerising

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Send this to a friend