Justice Antonin Scalia warned in the 2003 Lawrence v. Texas decision that the Supreme Court had created “a massive disruption of the current social order” by striking down a Texas law barring sodomy. He went on to write: “State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity … every single one of these laws is called into question by today’s decision.”
Sure enough, Scalia’s slippery slope argument has come to pass.
Three men from Thailand who engage in sex with other men have “married,” not to three other men, but to each other “in what is thought to be the world’s first three-way same-sex marriage.”
If same-sex sexualists argue that being ‘gay’ is innate, then what can be wrong with this? If it’s all about choice, then what can be wrong with this? If three men can marry, why not four or five, or about marriage to brothers and sisters, mothers and fathers?
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com