“There is only one law which ought to be followed, and that is the Sharia.” —Seyed Qutb
“Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and program.” —Seyed Abul A’ala Maududi
Maxine Waters’ Wrongheaded View of Sharia Law
Maxine Waters believes that Shariah Law can be implemented in concert with the US Constitution. Anyone who believes differently is a hate-mongering Islamophobe, according to Waters. Many Democrats, like Waters, have been pushing this narrative for years, and, although it is blatantly untrue, it has taken root in the world of low-information voters.
What Is Sharia Law?
Sharia Law is political Islam. It is the part of Islamic ideology that enforces Mohammed’s vision of how everybody should live in submission to Allah. Most Americans—be they liberal or conservative—could care less about how Muslims worship. What most Americans worry about is how the establishment of Sharia in America might affect Americans’ ability to live peaceful lives.
The French Problem
France is now a country with 750 or more armed Muslim camps, where even angels fear to tread, let alone French government officials! Many Muslims there carry Kalashnikov AK-47s. A walk through one of these “no-go” zones is life-threatening to all kafirs (this is the word meaning unbelievers, carrying the denotation of “concealer” and the connotation of “reviled”).
Islamo-Nazi No-Go Zones and the Mosque of Notre Dame
Sharia Law is being obeyed by the French government in ceding these no-go zones to Islam. These zones can only grow, meaning there will be less and less France over time and more and more “New-Islamic France.” This New-Islamic France, an entirely Muslim entity under Sharia, will eventually swallow up France proper, in the process turning the Cathedral of Notre Dame into the Mosque Notre Dame.
At Long Last, Nazism Triumphs
As France goes, so will the rest of Europe. And Hitler-style Nazism will triumph over Europe in the end—albeit in the form of Islamo-Nazism—unless there is an armed uprising against Islam, to drive the Islamo-Nazis out of Europe altogether. (The connection between Hitler’s genocidal vision for the Jews and that of Islam, by the way, is a real one, Hitler having actively corresponded with the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hassan al-Banna, to offer him encouragement and funding for his Islamo-Nazi enterprise. Thus, Islamo-Nazism can be shown to share its beginnings with that that of Hitler’s Nazism in Germany.)
Maxine and the Muslim Brotherhood
In 2012, the Council of Pakistan Affairs and Islamic Society of Orange County, a Muslim-Brotherhood front group, welcomed Maxine Waters to one of their get-togethers. At the meeting, Waters accused Republicans of attacking Islam as a national security threat. Perhaps, if she were educated about Sharia, Waters would understand that the threat is real! In Waters’ honor, a comparison of America’s freedom-promoting Bill of Rights to Islam’s submission-oriented Sharia Law is provided below:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Dhimmis (kafirs who are protected by paying the jizya tax) have few rights. Kafirs may be murdered in the name of Allah; any speech that is even potentially offensive to Islam is forbidden under penalty of death; leaving Islam is punishable by death; publication of any work describing Islam unfavorably is punishable by death; people may not assemble for purposes unapproved by Islamic leaders; the right to petition is limited to Muslim men, and judgment rests with Islamic leadership. Anyone who gives comfort to a person who has criticized Islam may be viewed as an accomplice and put to death.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The right to self-defense is only guaranteed to Muslim men. Muslims have the right to murder kafirs without consequence. Only those who submit to Allah are worthy of protection of life.
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Jihad fighters may be quartered in your home, and you should feel privileged to serve Allah in this way.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
There is no protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. An Islamic government, if it feels there is some advantage in searching or seizing your home or property, may easily do so.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Also, under Islam, no Muslim may be punished for killing a kafir (unbeliever).
Anyone may be taken and held for any reason that serves Islam. No grand jury or trial jury is needed. There is no right to remain silent. You may be tried as many times as the Islamic government deems necessary. And your property may be seized for any religious reason that is valid under Sharia.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Prisoners may be held indefinitely. No charge must be filed, and no impartial jury trial may be demanded. There is no guarantee of confronting witnesses against you, nor do you have the right to subpoena witnesses in your favor.
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Jury trials in civil suits are not guaranteed under Sharia, since religious clerics will suffice in the judgment of all matters, criminal or civil.
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
There is no bail. The Islamic court can take anything away from you that it sees fit to take. Torture is allowed. In fact, thieves get their hands cut off, and raped women are flogged for adultery (and, in extreme cases, are given the death penalty). Only Muslims are protected from the death penalty for all crimes, with the exceptions of murder, adultery (easier to be proven against women than against men), and apostasy (leaving Islam).
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The people have no rights but, in all cases, submit to Allah.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
There is only one unified code of Sharia Law applicable to all.
The Constitution safeguards individual rights. Sharia forces individuals to surrender their rights. Quod Erat Demonstrandum.
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com