Congressman Tom Graves (R-GA) rose in the legislature to speak out in favor of a bill that would prohibit any legislatively controlled dollars to be used to fund President Obama’s executive orders on immigration. Rep. Graves spoke eloquently on the dangers of too much power being held in the hands of the Executive and on how the Legislature must act to stem the President’s strength.
Rep. Graves released a statement on his vote to fund the Department of Homeland Security while simultaneously defunding Obama’s Amnesty.
“Today, the House of Representatives voted to secure our homeland and uphold the Constitution. First and foremost, this appropriations bill provides for our national security. It includes funding for the largest border patrol force in history, increases resources for the prevention of cyber-attacks and ensures a strong Coast Guard. Second, this legislation denies any funds whatsoever from being used to carry out the president’s unconstitutional actions.
“The president, however, is already threatening to veto this legislation because it prevents him from implementing his political and unconstitutional actions. Make no mistake: a veto threat is a threat to our national security. But before this bill reaches the president’s desk, the new Senate Republican Majority must act. I urge my colleagues in the Senate to stand strong and act swiftly on this critical legislation.”
Rep. Graves voted in favor of all five amendments to H.R. 240, including the Aderholt Amendment and the Blackburn Amendment.
H.R. 240 passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 236 to 191.
Sadly, while Rep. Graves spoke eloquently on limiting Presidential powers, he must have forgotten what it means to be a fiscal conservative. The House Appropriations Bill actually increases the government’s 2015 budget over their 2014 budget by $400 Million. So it’s not exactly a win-win for conservatives…
Here’s what Rep. Graves said on Facebook:
I believe that words matter. And that’s why I took to the House Floor earlier today to speak out against the Obama administration’s unlawful actions, which the president himself said 22 times that he didn’t have the authority to execute. Please take a minute to watch my speech.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to read to you a few quotes.
First, “With respect to the notion that I can just suspend deportations through executive order, that’s just not the case, because there are laws on the books that Congress has passed… Congress passes the law. The executive branch’s job is to enforce and implement those laws.”
“The problem is that I’m the president of the United States, I’m not the emperor of the United States. My job is to execute laws that are passed.”
“I can’t do it by myself. We’re going to have to change the laws in Congress.”
“I am president, I am not king. I can’t do these things just by myself.”
“I’m not a king. You know, my job as the head of the executive branch ultimately is to carry out the law.”
“I’m bound by the Constitution; I’m bound by separation of powers. There are some things we can’t do. Congress has the power of the purse, for example.
These are the words and statements of the President of the United States. And, words matter.
But, even after the president said all of this, in a politically motivated action last November, he pursued a course that could allow up to 5 million undocumented immigrants to remain in the United States illegally and without consequence.
And, like my constituents, I am outraged.
President Obama defied the will expressed by the American people last November and blatantly contradicted his own statements about the limits of the Executive Branch. But, now let’s be clear, lest others confuse this issue today, this is not a debate about immigration.
That’ll come later. But, this is about the rule of law. This is about the constitutional separation of powers. This is about the respect we owe the American people. In this Appropriations bill, we’re exercising the power of the purse, and we’re taking a strong, narrow approach that will, first and foremost, provide security to our homeland.
And secondly, deny any funds whatsoever from being used to carry out the president’s unwise – and, in my opinion, unconstitutional – actions. Now, I have to say, the president was right about a couple of things: he is not an emperor and he is surely not a king. And House Republicans are united in making sure he doesn’t get away with acting like one either. And, yet, before the debate even begins, last night the president is already issuing threats.
He is threating to shut down the Department of Homeland Security because this bill prevents him from implementing his own ideology. But make no mistake: A veto threat is a threat to our national security.
A veto threat is an open invitation to our enemies.
And in the wake of the horrific terrorist attack last week in France, is the president really willing to compromise the safety of 320 million Americans to appease his base and score political points?
God, help us if that is the case. Today, it is up to us in the House. Let’s vote to defend the constitutional role of the legislature. Let’s vote to stop the president’s blatant overreach. And let’s vote to secure our homeland. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I yield back.
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com