The Media Shield Law Trap

In the wake of the Department of Justice’s assault on the media embodied by their illegal vacuuming up of the phone records at the Associated Press (AP) and their investigation into Fox News reporter James Rosen, several lawmakers advanced the notion that we needed a media shield law. Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) has proposed new legislation that would protect any “salaried agent” of a media company. That means to actually “count” as a journalist, a person would need to be a full time salaried employee of a reputable news agency, like the New York Times, Washington Post, or CNN.

Seems reasonable, no? Professional reporters get protected from too much government oversight, freeing them to report the news to us unfettered from government involvement.

It’s not reasonable though, because the media already has an almost absolute protection from the government guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution in the Bill of Rights.

press freedom“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

The scripting a law that guarantees the media certain protection from government intervention is simply overkill. The fact that we are even discussing a media shield law uncovers an even more sinister truth.

Simply needing to debate the need for media shield laws is a tacit admission that the government doesn’t care about our Constitutional rights. If the government wasn’t abusing those rights already, a media shield law would never need to be considered. So the real answer to the problem that necessitates a shield law is that we must rein in our overbearing government.

shield lawThere is more to be concerned about when we are discussing the creation of a media shield law. Any media shield law would legally give those in the media “more” of a First Amendment freedom than your average American citizen… simply because of the profession they chose. Does that seem like “free speech” to you? Your neighbor who works for CNN will have more of a legal “right” to free speech simply because of their place of employment.

It’s not okay.

Each and every American citizen is guaranteed their right to free speech in almost absolute terms, so long as they are not infringing on the rights of others. We have allowed the Supreme Court and our federal government to whittle away at this right over the years, and now we must make a stand and say, “Enough.” No more chipping away at the First Amendment. The government has no right to suppress the media, or to limit free speech. It’s time they realized that. The media shield law is a trap fellow conservatives; let’s not fall in.


The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

About the author

Onan Coca

Onan is the Editor-in-Chief at Romulus Marketing. He's also the managing editor at, and the managing partner at You can read more of his writing at Eagle Rising.
Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in Atlanta with his wife and their three wonderful children.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Don't Miss Out!!

Get your daily dose of Eagle Rising by entering your email address below.

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×
Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become an insider.

Send this to a friend