Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Climate Change Politics

Why Global Warming Believers Don’t Talk About These Storms

No one doubts that the climate changes. If it didn’t change, we wouldn’t have the Weather Channel.

Global cooling was all the rage just a few decades ago. When that didn’t pan out for the Globalists, Global Warming was invented. But not every change in climate resulted in warming. So Climate Change became the new label. When that didn’t work on the American people, Climate Chaos was made-up to scare people into voting for more government control.

“Twenty-eight U.S. senators held an all-night ‘talkathon’ . . . to call attention to climate change, an issue that only 24% of Americans say they worry about a great deal. This puts climate change, along with the quality of the environment, near the bottom of a list of 15 issues Americans rated in Gallup’s March 6-9 survey. The economy, federal spending, and healthcare dominate Americans’ worries.”

We’re also learning that any scientist who is a critic of man-made climate change is shut out of the discussion. The reason the “debate is over” concerning climate change is because climate change advocates don’t allow for debate.

For example, Professor Lennart Bengtsson, 79, a leading academic from the University of Reading, left the high-profile Global Warming Policy Foundation because he “was subjected to ‘Mc-Carthy’-style pressure from scientists around the world.” The Global Warming Policy Foundation is skeptical of the science behind the claim that humans are responsible for global warming. You can’t say that recent weather phenomena are “natural occurrences” and be permitted to speak on the subject. The Global Warming Taliban won’t allow it.

There have been a lot of “climate change” phenomena over the millennia, and not one of them had anything to do with what humans were doing. Here are some examples that Global Warmists don’t like to talk about:

Continue Reading at Godfather Politics…

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

About the author

Gary DeMar

Gary DeMar

  • tom s

    probably the thing that bothers me the most is the al gores of the country running around spreading their agenda trying to alarm everyone that the “sky is falling” and making himself/themselves multi millionaires doing so. It’s really too bad that there are so many people willing to transfer their money to someone doing this.

    • jim_shipley

      The are called liberals, they will take any chance to impose their ideas on others.

    • America_Woman

      Gullible people.

  • billyshafer

    If you remove Global Warming from the title and insert Global Cooling. You get the same scare tactics that were being used back then.

  • Janice

    Exactly what is the hard working American tax payer expected to do other than that we’ve always done for conservation. Try talking this climate trouble to China and India and South America…we have 3 colored garbage cans and never go anywhere but to work and school to save the cost of gas. WHAT WE ARE IN NEED OF IS A PRICE FREEZE ON food, gas, electric, water, clothing and rents and anything else.

    • jim_shipley

      Freeze the price and supply will disappear….it has been tried, remember Carter?

      • Progressive Republican

        Ya mean Nixon’s wage/price freeze?

  • mike slaney

    Well there is certainly one undisputed truth here, there is no lack of idiots and Liberals when dealing with climate prognosticators.

  • jim_shipley

    Yes it is true! The climate is changing, always has and always will and no amount of taxation will change it.

  • seeymour kleerly

    You’re a tool of the GREEDY Profit over People crowd!

    • Progressive Republican

      Once again, you are far too kind.

  • Progressive Republican

    Once again, serial liar ol’ Gar gets it wrong


    Well, not really.

    Y’see, 39 years ago Newsweek science editor Peter Gwynne wrote a nine-paragraph article about how it might look like maybe things were cooling off.

    A bit.

    One of the sources of this idea may have been a 1971 paper by Stephen Schneider who was a climate researcher at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland. His paper suggested that the cooling effect of dirty air could possibly outweigh the warming effect of carbon dioxide, potentially leading to an ice age if aerosol pollution quadrupled.

    Other scientists admitted the plausibility of this scenario as it had also become clear that the interglacial period we are in was lasting an unusually long time.

    He soon realized that he had somewhat overestimated the cooling effect of aerosol pollution and significantly underestimated the effect of CO2, meaning that warming was far more likely than cooling in the long run.

    In his review of a 1977 book called The Weather Conspiracy: The Coming of the New Ice Age, Schneider stated: “We just don’t know…at this stage whether we are in for warming or cooling – or when.” A 1975 report by the US National Academy of Sciences merely called for more research.

    Ever since then Gwynne’s “global cooling” story – and a similar Time Magazine piece – have been brandished rather gleefully by those who want the rubes to believe that it shows global warming is not happening, or at least that scientists – and often journalists – don’t know what they are talking about.

    This is clearly true of FRWNJ “journalists” like ol’ Gar here

    GOPTV/FOX loves to cite it. So does America’s favorite drug-addled pedophile and his radioland co-horts. Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla. went so far as to quote the story on the Senate floor.

    Gwynne, now 72, is a bit peeved that from a long career of distinguished science and technology reporting, he is most remembered for this one story.

    Who could blame him?

    “I have, in fact, won prizes for science writing,” he said, with more than a hint of annoyance, in a recent interview.

    The story pointed out – accurately – that there had been a gradual decrease in global average temperatures from about 1940, which is now believed to be a consequence of soot and aerosols that offered a partial shield to the earth as well as the gradual retreat of an abnormally warm interlude.

    Some climatologists predicted the trend would continue, inching the earth toward the colder averages of the “Little Ice Age” from the 16th to 19th centuries.

    Gwynne recalled, “When I wrote this story I did not see it as a blockbuster. It was just an intriguing piece about what a certain group in a certain niche of climatology was thinking.”

    Nothing more.

    It was certainly no blockbuster article. It wasn’t even a cover story or even “front page news”. It was a one-page article on page 64.

    In the publication world, this is sometimes referred to as “burying”.

    Mark McCaffrey, programs and policy director of the National Center for Science Education in Oakland says, “If it weren’t for the fact that humans had become a force of nature, we would be slipping back into an ice age, according to orbital cycles.”

    But, he said, earth’s glacial rhythms are “being overridden by human activities, especially burning fossil fuels.” The stories about global cooling “are convenient for people to trot out and wave around,” he said, but they miss the point:

    “What’s clear is we are a force of nature. Human activity – the burning of fossil fuels and land change – is having a massive influence. We are in the midst of this giant geoengineering experiment.”

    Oh btw, a survey of the scientific literature found that between 1965 and 1979, 44 scientific papers predicted warming, 20 were neutral and just 7 predicted cooling. So while predictions of cooling got more media attention, the majority of scientists were predicting warming even then.

Don't Miss Out!!

Get your daily dose of Eagle Rising by entering your email address below.

Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become an insider.

Send this to a friend