Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Climate Change Politics

George Will Crushes Global Warming Hysteria

Conservative icon George Will says that Global Warming hysteria is “socialism by the back door.”

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by

About the author

Onan Coca

Onan is the Editor-in-Chief at Romulus Marketing. He's also the managing editor at, and the managing partner at You can read more of his writing at Eagle Rising.
Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in Atlanta with his wife and their three wonderful children.

  • bob ashworth

    I agree with Will! Biggest scientific scam in history! No science, all politics.

  • ary

    George Will is on target. There is a God and God is in control of the weather. Global warming is a form of idolatry since the desire of those who posit something that cannot be proven is the desire to be God, and to micromanage every aspect of our lives. The one true God gives us a choice and wants us to acknowledge Him his omnipotence, in all our ways.

    • seeymour kleerly

      God can’t control man from polluting the earth’s atmosphere for over 150 years!

      • MyronJPoltroonian

        Hence, “Free Will”, eh?

        • seeymour kleerly

          Greed rules and Conservatives keep buying the propaganda..

  • CowboyUp Mayer

    Can we super glue and staple Al Gore’s lips together so we don’t have to hear his gloom and doom bullshit !

  • ICorps

    George Will is an on-again, off-again “conservative,” but when he’s “on-again,” he’s great! Unfortunately, “logic” does not “crush” a political scheme, and as Will points out, the political scheme is “socialism by the back door.”

    That means that you can cover the “socialist” drivers of the “hysteria” with snow and thermometers, and they will be undeterred. For them, facts are just obstacles to overcome in pursuit of their political scheme.

    How, then, can they be stopped? I do not believe they can be stopped by argument they ignore or by our majority of “low-information” voters, who accept whatever their masters tell them. I believe the only way will be when climatic evidence becomes so overwhelming that it makes them, and their supporters, look foolish.

    Unfortunately, that could mean a fairly long length of time–a length of time in which they can pursue their socialistic agenda.

  • Marc Jeric

    It is useful to remind ourselves of the 40-year old history of that UN-led conspiracy. It started in the 1970’s by the announcement of the coming “New ice age” scam (remedy – unilateral disarmament; the big guru of Global warming hoax is Dr. Hansen whom started his career by that :New Ice Age; scam); when that panic petered out in the 1990’s it continued by the announcement of the man-made catastrophic “Global warming” hoax (remedy = UN-sponsored world socialist
    government to “spread the wealth around and “reduce’ the world population from
    the existing 6.5 billion down to the “sustainable level of 1.5 billion);
    after 17 years of considerable global cooling that panic was replaced by the
    “Climate change” flimflam (so whatever happens with our climate – do
    “something”!) and now by the “Cap & trade” power grab with the purpose of
    nationalizing our energy companies. Whatever that coterie of government-paid
    drones controlled by the far-left UN Panel “specialists” is cooking up by means
    of faked data, reverse graphs (another guru of that conspiracy Dr. Mann “confused”
    cause and effect in his “hockey stick” graphs), and erroneous calculations –
    the final aim is to empower a new UN-sponsored world socialist government
    authorized to “spread the wealth around” and so save the planet from a sure
    annihilation caused by “rapacious and irresponsible capitalists”.

    Also, there is now a wealth of contrary literature debunking that gigantic conspiracy, written by investigative reporters and politicians Christopher Horner, Robert Carter, Senator Inhofe, Rupert Darwall, AW Montford, and David Archibald among other investigative journalists and politicians describing the lies, fakes, phony data, opposite conclusions, redacting by UN political hacks, reverse graphs, destruction of
    negative data, etc., that have exposed this far-left propaganda in painful detail.
    Also, the Oregon Petition (see Internet) signed by 31,487 independent
    US scientists (including 9,029 with PhD degrees), disputes the false “science”
    of the UN panel and its “scientists”. Former Vice-President Al “Jazeera” Gore,
    another low IQ bloviating gasbag, has ridden that “global warming” horse to a
    personal wealth estimated to reach a billion dollars, while being entertained
    by elegant and expensive hookers in luxury hotel suites.

  • Blessings

    I couldn’t get the video to come up, however, my take is… There’s a whole lot of people out there getting rich and a whole lot of suckers out there falling for this Global Warming is B.S…

  • MyronJPoltroonian

    I have posted this before and, I believe, it is even more appropriate today than it was when first posted. As today, the “Ordainer In Chief” can and does wave “His” magic pen and regulatory agencies leap to “His” commands.:

    The scientist Wolfgang Pauli was known for his often less than polite criticism of the work of some of his colleagues. He would sometimes exclaim “wrong” or “completely wrong” when he disagreed with someone. He even sadly said, „Es ist nicht einmal falsch“ [“It is not even wrong”]. The phrase “not even wrong” carries two different connotations. A theory can be “not even wrong” because it is so incomplete and ill-defined that it can’t be used to make firm predictions whose failure would show it to be wrong. This has been the situation of man made global warming/climate change theory from its beginnings to the present day. Most new theoretical ideas begin in this state; it can take quite a bit of work before their implications are understood as to whether the idea is right or wrong. There is, however, something worse than a wrong idea. In the case of the man made global warming/climate change theory, some researchers are abandoning fundamental scientific principals rather that admit a theory is wrong. Worse than being wrong is to refuse to admit it when one is wrong, or, as he phrased it: “Ganz Falsch”, i.e.: it is not even wrong, it is “completely false”. Not one of the computer models being used to predict the future of earth’s climate changes have ever been able to predict the climate changes from the past to the present, even though they were fed every last bit of scientific fact as based on the hard evidence of what has actually happened to our climate to date. That Al Gore (and his sycophants) intentionally use the term “denier” to imply that anyone who dares to disagree with them and their colleagues in the political sphere, or their coconspirators in the United Nations, is akin to the anti holocaust ranting’s of those who hate Jews. He and they also cleverly use the term “outlier”, which in the scientific community defines something in their findings that is at odds with the theory being tested, but is considered to be inconsequential to the final outcome (or “Solution”), to imply that the scientist’s, and any one else who disagrees with them, are not to be believed or listened to. “Scientific Method”? What Scientific Method does not allow for questioning and rigorous rebuttal of any and every theory – however “Established” and “Settled” it may appear to be? (I remind you of Einsteins Theory of Relativity having just been disproved/reproved. I.e.: “Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light” – However, “Something” just did/did not.) Why does the phrase “Socialism” come to mind? It’s because in order to ” … act before all the evidence is in, just in case it’s correct” requires an ungodly blend of Fascistic Socialism and Religious Fervor (a.k.a., “Environmentalism”) to be imposed on everyone. Carbon Credits; Cap and Trade; Mercury filled light bulbs; Toilet Capacity; Bovine Flatulence (a fitting term for the methods the “bull in the china shop” green regulators in charge envision implementing), and there are so many more to mention it would take a infinite compendium to index the injustices to be done in the name of “Saving the Planet”, “Before it’s too late!” (or we really know what we’re doing). Study the evidence with an open mind, not one filled with the preconceived notion that the only “pure” scientists are the ones who do research on the governments dole. (Where do you think most university research grants come from? How about evaluating possible peer pressure and “greener goals”, coupled with the drying up of funds for unpopular or unprofitable research? Don’t forget, tenure is, after all, basically a popularity contest.) If you believe that we can learn from the past, remember the recanting of his heliocentric theory, on the pain of death to be enforced by the “Learned” powers that be, by Galileo.

Don't Miss Out!!

Get your daily dose of Eagle Rising by entering your email address below.

Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become an insider.

Send this to a friend