Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

2016 Election

Trump Officially Wins Michigan by 10,714 Votes…Jill Stein Wants Recount

Written by Philip Hodges

Although the results of the vote count were released the day after election day, announcing that Trump had won the state, the results weren’t certified until Wednesday. Initially, Trump had won by 13,107 votes. But once the vote tally was certified, his lead shrunk a bit.

His official win makes him the first Republican to have won the state of Michigan since 1988.

The secretary of state’s office released this statement on Michigan’s vote-tallying process, in part:

“Many people have asked about Michigan’s process for counting ballots and certifying election results. Please be aware that all 1,521 Michigan cities and townships completed ballot counting and reported unofficial results by the morning of Wednesday, Nov. 9. The county canvassing boards, as they do after every election, then began their work to review and certify the results from each precinct.”

Green Party nominee Jill Stein has raised some $4.7 million – ironically more money raised in a vastly shorter amount of time than the $3 million she raised from her entire campaign – to pay for recounts in three closely contested states, including Michigan. The other two “suspicious” states are Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Infowars pointed out another irony:

Hillary won New Hampshire, Minnesota & Nevada by fewer votes than Trump won Pennsylvania, but there will be no recount in any of those three states.

While Trump won Pennsylvania by around 78,000 votes, Clinton won New Hampshire by less than 3,000 votes. Hillary won Minnesota by less than 44,000 votes and Nevada by around 26,000 votes.

Yet, no recount in those states will be conducted, even though Hillary won them by a smaller margin than she lost Pennsylvania.

So, why is Jill Stein spearheading the recount project when she clearly has nothing to benefit from it? Could it be that another campaign is pushing her to do it, so that this other campaign can be kept separate from it?

The media and the Clinton campaign were the ones who made it such a huge issue when Trump didn’t say whether he would concede the election (unless he won). Now, if the Clinton campaign are actually the ones behind this recount push – and they’re just using Jill Stein to lead it under the guise of “raising awareness” of our voting system’s vulnerabilities – then they know that everyone would point out the glaring hypocrisy. So, they have to pretend like they have nothing to do with it.

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com


About the author

Philip Hodges

Don't Miss Out!!

Get your daily dose of Eagle Rising by entering your email address below.

STAY IN THE LOOP
Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become an insider.

Send this to a friend