Constitution Politics

Crazy. During Hearing on Constitutionality of Obama’s Gun Grab Democrat Senator says She Doesn’t Want to Hear about the Constitution!

Barbara Mikulski
Tim Brown
Written by Tim Brown

Following the unconstitutional executive orders of Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah, Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) openly stated that she did not want to get into constitutional arguments regarding the matter.

“I look forward to…listening to the attorney general and listening to this wonderful panel that you’ve invited to participate today,” said said.

“So let’s solve the problem,” Mikuski added. “Let’s not get involved in constitutional arguments, and let’s help our American people be safe and secure in their home, their neighborhood, their school and their house of worship.”

See the problem? She is switching out liberty for security and the American people will end up with neither because the alleged threat against us will shift from common ordinary criminals to the criminal element in our government, like Ms. Mikuski, who doesn’t care for oath of office to uphold the Constitution.

The Constitution does not provide for Mikuski or her colleagues to provide any gun restriction or regulation. It does not give her or any other servant of the people the authority to “help our American people be safe and secure in their home, their neighborhood, their school and their house of worship.”

The things it does give power to Congress for, they ignore! They usurp this authority and the sadly, the American people allow them to not only talk about it, but to eventually implement it.

Barbara MikulskiMikuski’s statements came ahead of a Senate Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Subcommittee hearing, which heard testimony from Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who is not elected by the people and has no legislative authority to make up law nor enforce “law” that is not authorized in the Constitution.

Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) told Lynch, “The department is on notice. This subcommittee will have no part in undermining the Constitution and the rights that it protects.”

However, Lynch basically ignored that statement and claimed that she has “complete confidence that the common sense steps announced by the president are lawful.”

Lynch said that Obama’s actions were “well-reasoned measures” and are “well within existing legal authorities, built on work that’s already underway.”

The problem with that statement? None of it is authorized by Congress to legislate in the Constitution. Therefore, none of it is authorized in the Constitution for the Executive Branch to execute. So, I have no idea where the criminal Attorney General Loretta Lynch is getting her information that this is within existing legal authorities, but it is not the legal and lawful authority of the Constitution.

Both Obama and Lynch should be immediately removed from office and indicted for their crimes against the people. Second, members of Congress who have cowardly stood by and allowed all of this to go on this long, should also face aiding and abetting these criminals. Enough is enough!

 

from Freedom Outpost

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by EagleRising.com


About the author

Tim Brown

Tim Brown

Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com, husband to his wife, father of 10, jack of all trades, Christian and lover of liberty. He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina. Tim is also an affiliate for the brand new Joshua Mark 5 AR/AK hybrid semi-automatic rifle.

Don't Miss Out!!

Get your daily dose of Eagle Rising by entering your email address below.

STAY IN THE LOOP
Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become an insider.

Send this to friend